An interesting way of phrasing that, with a double negative to suggest the opposite of what the Greens have said they will do?
I know, we trust our readers to get to the end of the sentence. You’re being paranoid, again.
To write something clumsy and potentially misleading do you need a reason?
Here’s the source:
How difficult would it have been to just cut and paste one of the actual phrases used to get:
Talking-up Scotland 
To do otherwise would force the BBC to adopt a rational and inclusive approach to political balance, which the organisation currently frames by platforming a rather narrow choice between British Labour and English Torydum. And by promoting a false equivalence between facts and racist propaganda (see Brexit).
LikeLike
Of course, if the Green want to be taken seriously in Scotland, they’ll need counseling on how to support sustainability.
https://www.academia.edu/23215695/Constitution_and_Common_Law_in_Bioethics
LikeLike
It might be interesting to know how many requests for “legal advice” disclosures have been met by Labour and Tory governments at Westminster.
I would guess at NONE!
LikeLiked by 1 person
The BBC are raising their propaganda style its risky because those who are not fooled by sentences like this and do read to the end automatically think to themselves “ who wrote this “
“ what an idiot whoever they are “
Looks like whoever wrote it was too ashamed to give their name
LikeLike
Terrence
And upon Indy
The whole shall be shamed and named
They so lucky they operate in this parts
And not another place close to our shores
Because it would create a severe shortage of feathers,tar and brushes
But create a spectable
LikeLike
The Tories want to destroy the Holyrood Parliament. They want to destroy democracy. They are such hypocrites. Elected to an administration they want to destroy. Total troughers and opportunists. Evel.
LikeLiked by 1 person