As I await a response to one of my complaints on the Andrew Marr show, 70 days ago, it’s clear the BBC Complaints department is struggling.
After their supposed Education Correspondent’s difficulty with percentages yesterday, we should keep the pressure on:
Join me please.
Here’s the evidence they ignored too:
| Date | England | Scotland |
| 31.1.21 | 5167 | 1782 |
| 1.2.21 | 5009 | 6459 |
| 2.2.21 | 5360 | 7126 |
| 3.2.21 | 6764 | 8349 |
| 4.2.21 | 6936 | 8919 |
| 5.2.21 | 7172 | 8132 |
| 6.2.21 | 7170 | 8185 |
| 7.2.21 | 8153 | 9718 |
Excellent work as always John. We do not have a broadcaster worthy of the name.
LikeLike
Here is how to do a press briefing.
https://twitter.com/hashtag/RealDailyBriefing?src=hashtag_click
LikeLiked by 2 people
🤣
LikeLike
Jonathan Porritt is good for spoof (or rather the truth) BBC reporting, not seen anything of his for a wee while…must check it out…
LikeLike
I don’t think that name is correct however! Hmm…
LikeLike
John
May i have the name of the reporter and the program he used the words Roughly in Line
And I will lodge a complaint basically on the following reasons
Scotland / million on 7.2.21.
Administered exactly 19.2 % more vaccines
Than England
So please explain if the same standards were applied to the following as a acceptable margin of error
1.Targeting of a Nuclear Warhead which no doubt BBC could report as collateral damage
2.Setting out the footprint of a large corporate new HQ building tightly adjacent to land you do not own
Would BBC report that the owner has settled with adj. land owner.but fail to say that the completed Building is now Demolished
3.Is a error of 19.2 % perfectly acceptable
for a Aircraft upon which are the most Snr.Managers of the BBC are aboard landing in dense fog and solely by Auto Pilot
But the transponder and receiver are acting on co ordinates 19.2 % out
I only accept a reasoned reply on the grounds
That your quote was actually rough and way out of line or What you consider as a acceptable actual margin of error and not of proximity
So dependant on your reply you are either
Accept your reporting as inaccurate or indeed you are a fool
Never ever under any circumstances can 19.2% being acceptable by merely camouflaging with such Weasel Words
LikeLike
John
I added my complaint too and for what it’s worth also drew attention to their erroneous claim that Care Homes had been “done”.
LikeLike