For some reason, the research carried out by Ipsos-MORI, to establish what the folk of Glasgow think about sectarian marches, did not ask enough of them the obvious question but rather tried ‘to get behind public reasoning rather than take a head count of who thinks what.’
What is this, an undergraduate Sociology project?
Is this what the citizens thought they were getting? Given the many reports of violence and disruption, didn’t they think they were going to get a say in whether or not to ban them?
Why is David Leask apparently content with this approach?