Parents used by politicians cannot be allowed to overwhelm scientific evidence

BBC Scotland call for inquiry to put the science to one side
Herald calls for inquiry to put the science to one side

I’m still a parent. My wife is still a parent. Now they’re all big we’re a bit better, thank you.

We used to be parents of children. It’s not a healthy situation to be in. Deeply instinctive and protective, you will do anything, believe anything about any risk you perceive in their environment.

Given the power to do so, some less-educated, would string up paediatricians if told there was one living nearby, as they hunt for their missing child.

The parents of children who die will seek vengeance. If their child dies in hospital then something went wrong that could have been prevented and blame must be applied somewhere. Otherwise, they may have to confront the awful possibility of a physical weakness in their child, a vulnerability, which they have passed on to them. That cannot be allowed.

Though that death is a tiny statistical exception to the experience of thousands of other children over years and years in that hospital and where an infection may only have played a ‘contributory‘ indeterminate part, even though medics work in a world where billions of bacteria and viruses, most undetectable and irresistible, swirl around them and their patients, that one, which may have played a part in one child’s death, their child, should have been prevented and a price must be paid.

Enter a politician and/or a legal type and, of course, a journalist, and suddenly, the parent maddened by grief once more by their words, is empowered.

For more than a year now, we’ve seen these reports of the death of a single child, sometimes two or three, associated with infections in Scottish hospitals.

Statistically, they have all been the kind of phenomena ignored in England where they have hospitals, in East Kent and Shropshire for example, associated with multiple deaths and clear evidence of malpractice.

Scientifically, they have all been inspected by professionals neither grief-stricken nor drawn by the smell of blood or money. The reports have found no cause for the damnation of anyone or of any department based on evidence of malpractice.

But, because the parents, their grief still stoked by politicians, lawyers and journalists, remain unconvinced, as maybe I would have too were it my child, those reports based on reason above emotion cannot be allowed to stand, cannot be the end, because they do not fit the story the parents, the opposition politicians, the lawyers and the journalists need, to be content, in their worlds, saturated with those all-too-human notions of tragedy, failure and retribution.

And so, we see a trumpet call for the public inquiry to satisfy those emotional needs and presumably, though not openly of course, put them before the science. The mob must have blood.

The parents are not to blame for doing what parents do, but the others should be ashamed.

4 thoughts on “Parents used by politicians cannot be allowed to overwhelm scientific evidence”

  1. Here is the remit for the investigation into the construction of the hospitals. I’m glad to see such a thorough approach.

    The overarching aim of this Inquiry is to consider the planning, design, construction, commissioning and, where appropriate, maintenance of both the Queen Elizabeth University Hospital Campus (QEUH), Glasgow and the Royal Hospital for Children and Young People and Department of Clinical Neurosciences (RHCYP/DCN), Edinburgh.

    The Inquiry will determine how issues relating to adequacy of ventilation, water contamination and other matters adversely impacting on patient safety and care occurred; if these issues could have been prevented; the impacts of these issues on patients and their families; and whether the buildings provide a suitable environment for the delivery of safe, effective person-centred care.

    The Inquiry will make recommendations to ensure that any past mistakes are not repeated in future NHS infrastructure projects. The Inquiry will do this by fulfilling its Terms of Reference.

    Terms of Reference…

    Liked by 2 people

  2. The Sunday Herald had an article on this issue today. From the tone and tenor of the quotes from the parents they appear to be calling into question the findings of the judge led inquiry BEFORE it has even sat.!!!

    Liked by 2 people

  3. Hard to know what to say really, but lowlifes in the Britnat media will do what they are told and whatever it takes to undermine and demonise the Scottish government, especially now that so many people see that they are doing a very good job with regard to Covid19 in Scotland. A major setback for the unionists’ usual silencing of the ScotGov, and the (so called) media controlling the narrative.

    Liked by 1 person

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in: Logo

You are commenting using your account. Log Out /  Change )

Google photo

You are commenting using your Google account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.