Why statue-toppling is a distraction that suits the powerful

In 2003, the toppling of Saddam Hussein’s statue in Firdos Square, Baghdad, received saturation media coverage which fuelled the perception that the war had been won. This event along with George Bush’s hackneyed declaration of victory aboard a battleship in the Persian Gulf, diverted attention from start of a long and costly conflict.

Confederate general Robert E. Lee: Fort Meyers, Florida

In the same way,the statue toppling of Confederate generals across the US and the slave trader in Bristol is diverting attention from what really matters to the Black Lives Matter movement – real social change.  These violent emotional TV dramas have shifted the debate on to what, for the government and the media is familiar territory. Already we see authorities, sensing the powerful forces at play, prepared to remove statues. This will be easier and cheaper than actually dealing with the massive problems of inequality and poverty in housing, education and employment.

2 thoughts on “Why statue-toppling is a distraction that suits the powerful”

  1. Your last two sentences say it all! UK, the land which is content to bumble along with snouts in the trough for those with access to the troughs and only take minimal action when the troughs are under threat.

    Like

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out /  Change )

Google photo

You are commenting using your Google account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.