As attendance soars at GP walk-in clinics, Jackie Baillie rides the Scotsman off a readership cliff

In the Ailing Scotsman today, Jackie Baillie turns up to lie about walk-in clinics.

The facts:

From the Scottish Government 26 August 2026:

First Minister John Swinney has announced 24 more areas will benefit from new GP-led walk-in services across Scotland, bringing the number of centres planned or operational to 40.

Work is underway with health boards to establish new walk-in services for communities including Angus, Dumbarton, East Kilbride, East Renfrewshire, Edinburgh, Falkirk, Glasgow, Inverness, North Ayrshire, Paisley, Shotts, Tweeddale and West Lothian. Many will be able to open within a year.

Proposals are also in development for walk-in services in communities in Ayr, East Dunbartonshire, Glasgow, Glasgow North East, Glenrothes, Grangemouth, Inverclyde, Musselburgh, North Lanarkshire and Oban.

It comes as First Minister John Swinney marked the official opening of the 11th GP walk-in service in Buckhaven in Fife and announced an extension of the pilot programme until April 2029.

The GP walk-in pilot is testing new ways of accessing same-day care from GPs, Advanced Nurse Practitioners or other clinicians at a wider range of times. They have been designed to provide more choice for patients while helping to relieve pressure on wider NHS services.  https://www.gov.scot/news/new-gp-walk-in-services-announced/

We’ve already seen the wrong-headed opposition to this pilot:

BBC Scotland, Aimee Stanton, 28 july 2026, claimed, despite revealing the above graph in their own report:

GP walk-in clinics see low attendance leading to accusations of failure – A series of walk-in GP clinics which the Scottish government said would end the “8am rush” for appointments have seen low attendance rates, first figures show.

and:

Dr Iain Morrison, chairman of the BMA’s Scottish GPs committee, said doctors had expressed reservations about the walk-in clinics when they were first announced – and it now looked like a case of “I told you so”. He told BBC Radio Scotland Breakfast (RSB): “In terms of any pilot it’s important to learn to fail fast.

“My concern is that we’re not going to learn to close this down when all the evidence suggests that it’s not working.

“It’s going to continue to be worked upon, potentially expanded, despite evidence crying out that it’s not having the impact that’s desired.”

He said it would appear the scheme was more about politics rather than practicality. Morrison said ministers should have learned lessons from a similar scheme introduced in England nearly 20 years ago which, he said, had failed to relieve pressure on other NHS services.

Source: https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/articles/crmrk48zd9ro

There is so much wrong in the above, so uneducated, so self-centred, so greedy.

First, a reasonable science-based length for a pilot this kind to be meaningful would be at least 12 months and preferably 24 or 36 months after the initial ‘ramp-up period.’ We are still in the ramp-up period with only 10 of the 16 planned centres so far open. https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC10354383/

Second, learning from the English scheme has limits given the increasingly diverging NHS systems in England and Scotland but, in addition, it is important not to accept the BMA Scotland’s review of the evidence, selected only to back-up their prior views and, shamefully ignoring the work of Professor Chris Salisbury of the University of Bristol who gold-standard research revealed critical positive findings.

Improved access for certain groups: Centres clearly improved access, particularly for young and middle-aged men (historically lower users of traditional general practice) and people seeking care for recent-onset minor illnesses/injuries. Users often attended on the first day of symptoms for reasons of convenience, speed, and no need for an appointment.

High patient satisfaction: Users were generally more satisfied with walk-in centres than with general practice consultations (e.g., adjusted differences of around 6–7 percentage points in satisfaction scores). Care was viewed as high-quality and appropriate by both patients and staff in many assessments. Waiting times were often short and consultation times longer than typical GP appointments.

Safe, appropriate care for minor issues: Quality of care was at least comparable to general practice for the problems presented; most users felt the attendance was appropriate. https://www.bristol.ac.uk/media-library/sites/primaryhealthcare/migrated/documents/wiceval.pdf

Later patient surveys of GP-led walk-in centres similarly found high satisfaction (86–93% highly or fairly satisfied) and that centres increased access to GP-type care, with many attending because of difficulty seeing their own GP (working hours, closed surgery, or preference for no appointment). https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC3637583/

There’s a simple message here for BMA Scotland and BBC Scotland – shut-up, wait and try to be ready to report accurately and fairly on behalf of the citizens and taxpayers you owe for your comfortable employment.

Footnote: Aimee Stanton’s portfolio seems to be mostly about events in Whakatāne, New Zealand, perhaps explaining her lack of knowledge of GP walk-in clinics? https://muckrack.com/aimee-stanton/articles

Might BBC Scotland employ someone competent?

As of 26 August, the Scottish Government stated that more than 10,500 walk-in cases had been seen, in only 11 centres, in the first six months since the first service opened in February.https://www.gov.scot/news/new-gp-walk-in-services-announced/

Judging by the end-June line graph, that’s a more than 100% surge in attendance.

Crowdfunder - https://www.crowdfunder.co.uk/p/help-talking-up-scotland-keep-going
Bank transfer - JOHN WATSON ROBERTSON Sort Code – 08-91-04 Account 12266421

Discover more from Talking-up Scotland

Subscribe to get the latest posts sent to your email.

7 thoughts on “As attendance soars at GP walk-in clinics, Jackie Baillie rides the Scotsman off a readership cliff”

  1. hey Prof,

    Why not tell everyone what the Scotsman’s circulation figure is?

    That IS a truly shocking statistic.
    And Jackie Baillie’s approval ratings? Does she have any approval? From anyone?

    Liked by 3 people

    1. The only people that can access these figures are advertisers buying space in the paper.

      Earlier this year, The Scotsman, like all of the other yoon media operating in Scotland, decided to hide the number of copies they sell, presumably because their numbers are so low that they no longer exist to make money, but solely to lie to, gaslight & manipulate their readership for propaganda reasons.

      Liked by 2 people

      1. Via AI = The estimated daily print circulation of The Scotsman is not officially published for October 2026, but based on recent historical trends, it is estimated to be fewer than 6,000 copies

        Stephen McKenzie

        Like

  2. As Jackie Baillie would say ” Everyone knows that I talk through my a*se !”

    I doubt anyone would contradict her on that .

    Like

  3. On the day after the 2007 elections to the Scottish Parliament, and as it became clear that Labour would not be the largest party at Holyrood, I heard an interview with Jackie Baillie. This was the first time I was aware of her despite her having been in Parliament since 1998 and having held a ministerial appointment.

    Labour in their complacent arrogance had not put any of their ‘stars’ in the list ballot because they were confident they would win their constituency seats – butt they didnae! Consequently, they were left with a number of unmemorable numpties who were elected. Baillie was one of the few leading players to win her constituency.

    The media were unprepared for this and actually asked pointed questions about the reasons for Labour’s failure. Baillie was pure bealin – it was everybody’s fault but Labour’s and, no, the result was not a vote of no confidence in Labour. Her attitude was one of, ‘Hell mend, the bastard electorate for electing the SNP.’

    Since then, her entire career has been based on carping and cavilling and Labour’s stance for nearly 20 years has been a protracted oppositionist huff, not just directed at the SNP (and Greens) but with the Scottish electorate.

    Liked by 1 person

    1. I actually admired the Labour Party for introducing newbies to the regional vote and restricting the big hitters to the constituency, even if their motivation was self-interest and arrogance as you rightly state. It is galling to see a constituency reject simply fall back on the regional vote maintain ‘same-old’. Candidates should be restricted to either constituency or regional vote and not allowed to stand in both. So well done to Labour in that respect in 2007. Excellent result, though 😀

      Like

Leave a Reply