The BBC in Scotland platform ‘experts’ who all have a rabid #SNPBAD angle in their opinions

Prof Em June Andrews  Officer of the Order of the British Empire (OBE) in 2016

By Liz S

The BBC in Scotland platform those (same) ‘experts’ who are to be assumed to be neutral , but as experts , they all somehow always seem to have a rabid #SNPBAD angle in their opinions .

So then with many of these guests being presented as politically ‘neutral’ you then find that after you do just a wee bit of research, or you already know who they are, it is clearly obvious and so then firmly established that they have an affiliation with some opposition political party to the SNP.

In April 2026 MSM Monitor posted this:

“The latest edition of Scotcast features well known Scottish Labour activist Prof. June Andrews but fails to inform people of her political background. In the 2024 general election she campaigned for Labour candidate Gregor Poynton. In Oct 2024 BBC Scotland had to apologise for platforming the same academic without telling people she was a Labour activist. Andrews is currently posting pro-Labour campaign material on social media. Martin Geissler and his Scotcast colleagues have some explaining to do”.

BBC corrections and clarifications noted that apology in stating that:

“BBC Radio Scotland, 28 October 2024

In an interview about charity Age Scotland’s concern that more older people will be taken to hospital with hypothermia this year following cuts to the winter fuel payment, the programme spoke with a guest as an expert in the care of older people.

Our editorial guidelines state that “We should not automatically assume that contributors from other organisations (such as academics, journalists, researchers and representatives of charities and think-tanks) are unbiased. Appropriate information about their affiliations, funding and particular viewpoints should be made available to the audience, when relevant to the context.”

While the contributions from the guest were appropriate for the item, in hindsight, with the interview moving into areas of political decision-making, the programme should have found a way to convey to listeners more information on the guest’s party political standpoint. We have reminded our teams of the importance of this in preparing and conducting interviews”.

So they, BBC HQ, may have “reminded our (their) teams (in Scotland) of the importance of this in preparing and conducting interviews” but it seems that they, BBC Scotland, are clearly not listening , as in this is obviously falling on deaf ears.

Though I strongly suspect that they, BBC Scotland, are not being reminded by BBC HQ to “convey to listeners more information on the guest’s party political standpoint” but instead this pointless BBC Corrections and Clarifications is a way to avoid any real accountability and punishment by the media regulator.

A media regulator who is supposed to regulate media output .

As the BBC , as a British broadcaster , see it as their job to make sure that the SNP are politically damaged and so then any, or all other parties ( pro UK ones) , who stand against them in Scotland then benefit from all and any #SNPBAD news via all of the most obvious anti SNP guests on the BBC. (this is done at both BBC Scotland branch office level and also at BBC HQ in London).

That political damage to the SNP by the BBC is also inflicted by their political editors , by all of the opposition parties of the SNP that the BBC regularly give a platform to in order to scream #SNPBAD and also basically anyone else that they, the BBC, thinks will be able to relate their own particular #SNPBAD story in order for the BBC to broadcast it on their various BBC news programmes, transmit it on BBC radio or publish it on their BBC website.

Once even more people in Scotland become enlightened to this above fact in respect to the BBC news teams, well then and only then can that finally further diminish an already failing British news corporation and so then see it falling even further into insignificance as a news source, and also as one that should be regarded as politically compromised, totally untrustworthy and extremely unreliable.

Amen to that.

Liz S


Discover more from Scotland's First and biggest Rebuttal Service -Talking-up Scotland

Subscribe to get the latest posts sent to your email.

7 thoughts on “The BBC in Scotland platform ‘experts’ who all have a rabid #SNPBAD angle in their opinions”

  1. As you say, Liz, it’s a ‘British news corporation’, and more and more it appears to be ‘politically compromised, totally untrustworthy and extremely unreliable’. Not a good look for any organisation that is supposed to be unbiased and presenting factual news.

    Liked by 1 person

  2. O/T

    Timing in politics is everything.

    Yesterday the BBC were reporting that the UK government were set to give the go-ahead to the new Jackdaw gas field.

    The (absolutely not) ‘Scottish’ Daily Express has a front page headline today that states:

    “Jackdaw drill hopes surging as heat turned on PM”

    Now timing and the word heat seems fitting.

    Why ?

    Well now that our Summer has passed and so with an assumed perception that there will then be less chance of wildfires and also another assumption that the constant heatwaves are also past , then in very dodgy UK government timing it seems to be a case of that “Now is the time” for such an announcement , as in a decision, to be made on this new gas field.

    If so then I wonder how long will it be until a similar announcement is made in respect to the Rosebank new oil field also being given the go-ahead.

    Some other papers also mention this news today on their front pages.

    However I note that none of them are highlighting in bold on their front page headlines that if this does indeed proceed then the 2024 Labour promise of a UK “Green revolution” is an utter farce.

    As is GB Energy. (which we all knew anyway).

    It seems that climate change is a non issue for Labour.

    However the impact of climate change is being experienced within areas of the UK State and so then reported.

    “Drought” (in some areas of the UK), “plummeting crop yields” (potential food shortages), “Livestock suffer”, “(excess) Deaths because of the heatwaves” and “damage to property and land” .

    However it seems that another kind of “Heat” is on for the UK government and also for the new UK PM as well.

    So as external pressure is applied then they , the UK PM and UK government, are being reported as now warming to the idea of this new gas field (and I suspect also potentially warming to the new Oil field as well – no pun intended).

    So business as usual , as in consequences be damned.

    Goodbye net zero and also confirmation that Labour are yet again warming to those policies as promoted by both Reform UK and the Tories.

    #BlueTories

    Liz S

    Liked by 2 people

  3. Remember how pally a certain Kirsty Wark of the BBC was with the McConnell family? He’s now a Labour Lord, of course.

    Even The Herald nearly 20 years ago had an article headlined “Antagonism to Salmond said much about Wark”.

    J & J

    Like

    1. Good recall!!!

      Back in 2007 (June 9) The Herald’s Martin Williams no less reported below this headline: ‘Salmond given apology for ‘rude’ Wark interview’ – which was on Newsnight.

      ‘The BBC yesterday formally apologised to Alex Salmond after receiving 120 complaints about the way Kirsty Wark handled a Newsnight interview with the First Minister.

      ‘It admitted the treatment of Mr Salmond had been “rude and dismissive” ..’

      Hard as it is to image given the political stance of most output from The Herald nowadays, the paper stuck with there story a but longer and followed up on June 11, 2007 with this headline: ‘Antagonism to Salmond said much about Wark’. The article includes examples of complaints about Ms Wark’s performance: they are scathing and point to political biases.

      See https://www.heraldscotland.com/default_content/12746880.antagonism-salmond-said-much-wark/

      Liked by 1 person

Leave a comment

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.