Climate change is real but there is no need for hysteria about the wildfire risk to Scotland

Image – abc13 Eyewitness News, California USA, January 2025
May 2023, Cannich, Highlands, Pic: Balintore Fire Station/SFRS

From BBC Scotland two days ago, the above and:

A devastating wildfire burning in the Cairngorms has entered its seventh day, as helicopters battle to stop the spread of the flames. Two specialist helicopters have been “invaluable” for waterbombing hard-to-reach areas, the Cairngorms National Park Authority says.

But the flames were allowed to torch the landscape for nearly two days before they arrived on the scene around Glenmore Forest Park. There’s been vocal frustration from some local people, who believe the wildfire might have been brought under control if specialist air support had been called in sooner.

Why the delay? Do Scotland’s firefighters have the aerial resources they need to tackle the growing threat of wildfires? The official line from the Scottish Fire and Rescue Service (SFRS) is that the Cairngorms wildfire has been “appropriately resourced” from the start, with more than 100 firefighters involved.

Just two years ago, firefighters from across the world, including wildfire hotspots like Australia, Portugal and Spain, gathered in Aberdeen for a conference to share the knowledge and techniques. As part of that event, a helicopter was brought in to demonstrate close-up some of the methods used to dowse fires from the sky. This was seen as particularly important and helpful to countries like Scotland, where the wildfire risk has been increasing with climate change.1

This media ‘wildfire’ is getting out-of-hand.

Devastating? The fires affected 27 000 acres with ‘more than 100 firefighters involved.

In the North-western US states on Oregon and Washington 10 000 firefighters are tackling fires across 700 000 acres.2

One hundred times as many firefighters, twenty-six times the area burned but only around twice the population of Scotland (5.5m to 12m).

I am by no means a climate change denier but the notion that Scotland now has a comparable wildfire risk to most other parts of the world is just hysterical.

Sources:

  1. https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/articles/cy8enzjdz0qo
  2. https://eu.registerguard.com/story/news/wildfires/2026/07/21/dozens-of-wildfires-burning-in-oregon/90995365007/

What has the trend been since 2 000 in terms of number of incidents and area damaged? Based on an Scottish Fire Service records:

Not conclusive without the last 5 years data but by no means suggesting a situation worthy of panic.

Sources:

  1. https://www.firescotland.gov.uk/news/new-collaborative-action-plan-unveiled-to-protect-scotland-from-increasing-wildfire-risk/
  2. https://www.gov.scot/publications/provision-analyses-scottish-fire-rescue-service-sfrs-incident-reporting-system-irs-data-relation-wildfire-incidents/pages/6/


Discover more from The 'Unstoppable' Talking-up Scotland

Subscribe to get the latest posts sent to your email.

2 thoughts on “Climate change is real but there is no need for hysteria about the wildfire risk to Scotland

  1. Last weekend I picked up Scotland on Sunday by mistake – it was beside The Observer, which I had intended to buy. So, I read it anyway.

    There was a piece by a senior member of staff of Scottish Land and Estates, which, to my surprise, was a balanced, nuanced, informative and constructive piece, which made no disparaging remarks about the Scottish Government.

    He was arguing for a cooperative dialogue amongst the various parties including the private estates and bodies like RSPB, to develop a strategy for dealing with what is likely to be an increasing incidence of wildfires due to climate change. Although it was not stated explicitly, an inference could be drawn relating to contributory funding from estates and bodies like RSPB in addition to funding for Scottish Fire and Rescue.

    With domestic and other fires in towns and cities, Scottish Fire and Rescue can redirect funding, staffing and resources to climate change issues like wildfires and flooding. A Scottish Government source talked about this.

    I was surprised and pleased to see one of our baleful mainstream media publish such a blame-free constructive piece. However, much of the rest of the paper was filled with antiSNP, antiSG, anti Scottish rubbish.

    Like

  2. Apologies! The penultimate paragraph should have begun: ‘With FEWER domestic and other fires ……’

    Like

Leave a comment

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.