The above is outrageous. There is no evidence presented by the writer to suggest she is in any position to predict what the outcome of the Scottish Government’s independent review of maternity services in Scotland will be. How dare she and they claim to know without waiting to hear the results?
She opens with:
Over the past few years, Britain has commissioned report after report into failures in maternity care. Shrewsbury and Telford. East Kent. Morecambe Bay. Nottingham. Most recently, the national investigation led by Baroness Valerie Amos.
https://www.thenational.scot/comment/26261264.maternity-services-need-culture-change/
There is no British NHS to commission a report into maternity services across the UK. All that she refers to are into NHS England and they are horror stories we have heard no hint of here.
She then writes, directly connecting the NHS Scotland review in the future to horrors of Nottingham:

The Ockenden review was built around detailed case reviews of families where mothers or babies had died or suffered severe injury. It concluded there were repeated instances where different care would reasonably have changed outcomes for thousands of babies and mothers, and described longstanding failures to investigate incidents properly and trust-board oversight failures.
By contrast, the Scottish inspections published so far are regulatory inspections, not retrospective reviews of hundreds or thousands of adverse clinical outcomes. They identify risks and weaknesses—for example, staffing shortages, delays in induction, governance problems and inconsistent escalation—but they do not conclude that Scotland has experienced an Ockenden-scale maternity scandal. The Scottish Government’s decision to commission an independent review is largely precautionary and aimed at understanding whether the recurring inspection findings indicate wider systemic problems.
In a 2023 column for The National, Assa Samaké-Roman described a serious postpartum haemorrhage after a C-section following the birth of her first child. She credited blood transfusions and care at Edinburgh’s Royal Infirmary with saving her life during her early days of parenthood. https://www.thenational.scot/comment/23449156.assa-samake-roman-blood-donations-saved-life/
You might think I too should just wait till the Scottish review reports, before speaking in defence of NHS Scotland but, while I have no such first-hand intimate experience of maternity care in Scotland, unlike Samaké-Roman, I have fully researched the sector in terms of its performance based on the facts over several years.
Here are some:
Discover more from The 'Unstoppable' Talking-up Scotland
Subscribe to get the latest posts sent to your email.

I stopped reading the ‘National’ some time back…pro independence perhaps but I find them a tad anti SNP and sneekily seemed to have Labour on the front pages a lot…and nopt always in a bad light. Just my opinion of course and they may have improved? Hmm, or maybe not!
LikeLiked by 2 people
The writer is pregnant and , presumably , is scared by the toxic nature of the maternity services described in these ENGLISH NHS stories .
Sadly , she does not appear to have the wit to recognise that these are ENGLISH NHS faults . Scotland’s NHS maternity services may not be perfect but they are in no way close to the near catastrophic levels of care which have been tolerated in England’s Health (sic ) Trusts for years .
The editor of The National must be asleep at the wheel to allow this calumny on the Scottish maternity Services to be published .
LikeLiked by 3 people
Like ArtyHetty I cancelled my subscription to the National some years ago.
LikeLike
Where’s Liz?
LikeLike
Yes
I asked her in a comment last week.
No answer
Don’t have a contact
Worried
John
LikeLike
89.242.69.172
No email address, just this?
LikeLike