The current rail disputes have revealed the two-faced nature of Toryism in Scotland.
On the Scottish Conservative Party’s website one finds this dated 26 May 2022: ‘Stop Sturgeon’s ScotRail Cuts’. It relates to Scotrail’s response to the dispute with ASLEF.
The Scottish Tories wanted Scottish Government intervention: ‘Instead of TAKING CONTROL of this dire situation, Nicola Sturgeon is HIDING BEHIND SCOTRAIL ..’ (my emphasis)
Similar complaints were made by Tories in the Holyrood chamber on 8 June. First from Graham Simpson MSP: ‘I am encouraged to hear that there will be talks tomorrow. I know that THE MINISTER HAS NOT BOTHERED TO DIRTY HER HANDS BY GETTING INVOLVED IN THE TALKS SO FAR, but can she tell us how confident she is that the situation will be resolved tomorrow and that we will not have a summer of chaos?’
Then from Liam Kerr MSP: ‘Does the minister recognise the concerns of people who might think that, IN REFUSING TO STEP INTO THE SITUATION, SHE IS ABDICATING THAT ACCOUNTABILITY?’
So the Tory tactic was clear, to denigrate Scottish Government ministers for their lack of direct intervention to resolve the ASLEF dispute.
Today the BBC News website is covering the RMT dispute with Network Rail and train operating companies. The headline is: ‘IT IS NOT FOR THE GOVERNMENT TO INTERVENE TO STOP RAIL STRIKES, the transport secretary has said – despite unions calling for talks.’
We’re told: ‘Mr Shapps said negotiations HAD TO TAKE PLACE BETWEEN UNIONS AND EMPLOYERS – RATHER THAN MINISTERS – “In any pay discussion, in any negotiation over terms, over in this case modernisation, IT’S ALWAYS THE EMPLOYER AND THE UNION WHO NEED TO GET TOGETHER to speak,” he said.’
The BBC adds: ‘Although most rail operators are not owned by the government, THEY ARE NOT ENTIRELY INDEPENDENT’ adding ‘The government provides subsidies to the network – including £16bn to keep the railways running during the pandemic – and NETWORK RAIL, WHICH OWNS THE TRACKS AND OTHER INFRASTRUCTURE, IS GOVERNMENT-OWNED.’
A Tory minister keeping his ‘hands clean’ and ‘hiding’ behind government-owned Network Rail? Do Mr Simpson and Mr Kerr – or Douglas Ross – have nothing to say about the Westminster government’s seeming ‘abdication’? After all, their constituents in Scotland will be among those suffering inconvenience if RMT members strike.
5 thoughts on “Rail disputes have revealed the two-faced nature of Toryism in Scotland”
Very much a case of
Silence is golden
White man speak with forked tongue
Sauce for the Goose is ?
Kick with the left as you do with the right
What you do to one side,must also be done to the other
Balance and Harmony ?
Equinaminous to all
Take your pick as to what is correct here
Despite the obvious
Any who attempt to refute
May be described as
” Being hard of considered thought “
LikeLiked by 2 people
Aye, had noted Stewart’s comment earlier, as good an exposee as any of what constitutes modern UK politics, and the equally two-faced role of the media, the problem for both is their verbiage meets a wall of incantation “ah smell shite…”.
LikeLiked by 1 person
good work Stewartb, it’s much the same gaslighting that sees the ScotGov lambasted daily by Unionist politicians and their media chums on NHS matters, whilst the UKGov is never connected to any NHS stories, no matter how bad.
LikeLiked by 2 people
It is quite interesting to note the lack of anything to attack the SNP with on the “Rail Strike” by the Herald today, instead we get two stories about the disruption in Scotland, lack of trains etc. but nothing that I can see to blame the SNP with.
The result has been for one of the stories that has been up for over 6 hours there are no comments and the other one for 1 hour, also no comments.
Maybe its a joint training course day for SiU, Scotland Office, Herald journalists today 🙂
LikeLiked by 3 people