Cancer deaths fall despite pandemic effects on treatment

Line chart presenting data that shows the age-adjusted cancer mortality rate, or risk of dying from cancer, has decreased over the last decade but the number of deaths due to cancer has increased.

Throughout 2020, opposition politicians and MSM warned of a ‘tsunami’ of cancer deaths as a result of reduced diagnosis and treatment. This, sickeningly, became a regular basis for attack on the SNP Government’s management of the pandemic measures and of NHS Scotland.

Based on today’s report, we can see cancer deaths in Scotland for 2020, after 9 months of reduced treatment, have continued to fall as a mortality rate and, for the first time in 5 years, fell in absolute terms.

Despite the latter evidence, the report insists:

The age-adjusted cancer mortality rate, or risk of dying from cancer, has decreased over the
last decade but the number of deaths due to cancer has not (Figure 3)

Page 7

The number of deaths for 2019, pre-pandemic, is, as far as I can see not reported, but clearly down judging the graph.

5 thoughts on “Cancer deaths fall despite pandemic effects on treatment

  1. Living in a great British Democracy
    Has not help Scotland


    Liked by 1 person

  2. Apologies for going O/T and long but its hard to ignore Barbados today!

    Congratulations are due to the people of Barbados as they celebrate both the 55th anniversary of their country’s independence and also their first day as a republic! It’s hard not be very envious!

    We will never know what ‘remarks’ designed to influence constitutional decisions in Barbados may have been made by the British monarch or ‘palace’ officials or UK government ministers at key moments – prior to becoming independent in 1966 and prior to removing the British monarch as head of state now in 2021. However, I’ve been interested in the sentiments expressed by senior members of the royal family both now and also previously on the 50th anniversary of independence. It triggered memories of the queen’s intervention in Scotland’s decision making in 2014.

    Firstly in the present context of the monarch losing part of her realm, this from Prince Charles’ speech in Barbados:

    “Emancipation, SELF-GOVERNMENT AND INDEPENDENCE were your way-points. Freedom, justice and SELF-DETERMINATION have been your guides. Your long journey has brought you to this moment, not as your destination, but as a vantage point from which to SURVEY A NEW HORIZON.” (my emphasis)

    “Tonight you WRITE THE NEXT CHAPTER IN YOUR NATION’S STORY, adding to the treasury of past achievement, collective enterprise and personal courage which already fill its pages.

    “Yours is a story in which every Barbadian, young and old, can take the greatest pride – INSPIRED BY WHAT HAS COME BEFORE them and CONFIDENT WHAT LIES AHEAD.”

    “I remain deeply committed to this very special country, and to your future prosperity and wellbeing.”

    Based on the above, the ‘family’ do seem to be coping well with this loss of realm (although at present the official web site seems not to have noticed that anything at all has happened)!

    But perhaps the tone has been LESS gracious towards Barbados over its independence from the UK? Well no! On the 50th anniversary of independence in 2016 the queen wrote this: “Prince Philip and I send our warmest wishes to the Government and the people of Barbados on the occasion of your 50th Anniversary of Independence.’

    The statement went on: ‘Since you became an independent country in 1966, YOU HAVE CONTINUED TO FLOURISH and grow into a strong and confident nation.

    ‘Our countries have a shared history, shared values and an affection which CONTINUES TO BIND us in friendship. On this day of celebration, I send my congratulations to you on your Golden Jubilee of Independence.

    ‘Your independence was A DECLARATION OF CONFIDENCE in the future. And 50 years on, Barbados is a country rightfully proud of its vibrant culture, its sporting prowess, and its natural beauty that attracts visitors from all over the world.’

    And then this: ‘Tonight WE PAY TRIBUTE TO THOSE LEADERS WHO HELPED FORGE INDEPENDENCE. Independent Barbados is to be warmly congratulated for having been A MODEL INTERNATIONAL CITIZEN for 50 years, an unfailing champion of Democracy and the rule of law. You have been A SHINING EXAMPLE of the values which unite our Commonwealth family to which The Queen attaches special importance – integrity, kindness, selflessness and service.’

    In a speech on the same occasion in 2016 delivered in Barbados, the Duke of Sussex said: ‘You are a REMARKABLE NATION and I have no doubt that you have a REMARKABLE FUTURE ahead.’

    So after independence, indeed EVEN after just becoming a republic, the British monarchy continues to value and praise Barbados. To those in Scotland for whom the position taken by the monarchy may matter, surely Scotland would attract similar sentiments? Unless of course ex-colonies are due different, greater levels of respect than supposedly equal members of this UK union?

    (I note for information that Barbados, colonised by England/Britain in c.1627, became independent from the UK in 1966 following the passage of the Barbados Independence Act by the UK parliament. This followed very shortly after a general election victory in Barbados by pro-independence parties on 3rd November, 1966.)

    Liked by 4 people

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in: Logo

You are commenting using your account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.