The Scotsman and the Herald this morning.
I suppose she does do the announcements of those figures every day so maybe that’s understandable.
Is it a kind of demonising subconsciously perhaps damaging her reputation and that of the SNP?
Is it, paradoxically, perhaps due to how well she does it, having the opposite effect?
It’s certainly different:
The Guardian choosing not to use Matt Hancock’s mug and the Times not even interested:
The Telegraph was no more interested. The wrong comparisons for the Herald and the Scotsman? How about the Daily Mail? Their readers will want to know about the surge in cases:
Fair enough, back to my two questions. The Herald may have answered them:
It’s the second? The more they make her the face of even negative facts, the stronger she gets? Even if they sometimes use a picture of Ruth Davidson pretending to be nice to a wean?