A screenshot of a cell phone

Description automatically generated

Just below the image, the reporter tells the truth:

‘Before the Queensferry Crossing opened in August 2017, its designers claimed it would not be closed by high winds and they have been correct. Instead, an unexpected problem has been detected with ice.’

It’s there, so does it matter? You can hear the editor:

‘We respect our readers’ intelligence! Headlines cannot be too long!’

That the bridge should never close ever at all regardless, has become a popular myth spread by headlines. Its impact is similar to the ‘Once in a lifetime’ myth.

I guess, intuitively, most of us would think it does matter because we have often skimmed newspapers reading only the headlines of many of the articles. I’ve known for decades from empirical research evidence that it is true. Most [80%] readers only scan the headlines and even if they read the full article, their understanding will often remain that which they first got from the headline:

https://www.newyorker.com/science/maria-konnikova/headlines-change-way-think

https://www.campaignlive.co.uk/article/eight-ten-people-read-headline/1374722

To whom is the damage done? In this case, our Opposition politicians aided by the media made it all too clear that this was the consequence of incompetence by the SNP Government. From Jackson Carlaw:

“The continued closure of the Queensferry Crossing is a damning indictment of this government. Whilst Nicola Sturgeon is swanning about in Brussels, Scots commuters are stuck without vital infrastructure.”

He wasn’t alone:

A close up of a mans face

Description automatically generated