Jenny Marra’s humungous hypocrisy as she slides to the other side on NHS Tayside’s breast cancer treatment

A screenshot of a computer

Description automatically generated

In the Holyrood Education, Communities and Justice Committee on Tuesday 29th October 2019:

Jenny Marra (North East Scotland) (Scottish Labour): To ask the Scottish Government when it will acknowledge and reply to the letter of 22 April 2019 from the Head of the School of Mathematics and Statistics at the University of St Andrews, Professor Mark Chaplain, which set out a mathematical and scientific assessment of the breast cancer dosages in NHS Tayside.

Holding answer issued: 29 October 2019 (S5W-25579) Jeane Freeman: A holding answer was provided.

https://www.parliament.scot/S5ChamberOffice/WA20191029.pdf

Boy, has she changed her tune! Professor Chaplain’s arrival on the scene to defend NHS Tayside’s Oncology Department and their decision to use lower doses of chemotherapy was not what she and, of course, Reporting Scotland, wanted to hear as they gorged on the possibility that the department might be ‘dysfunctional’, as Lisa Summers hoped it might be. On April 5th, in the Dundee Courier, she said:

There should be a public inquiry established with urgency to clarify why this situation was allowed to happen and went unchallenged until a whistle-blower had the courage to speak out. Serious questions need to be asked of the doctors and management at Ninewells. Staff said they were in ‘lockdown’ and had to continue to give low dosages of chemotherapy.

Then on the 29th May in the Herald:

Whilst the past can’t be changed, the Scottish Government must learn lessons to ensure that these kinds of issues don’t emerge again. She spoke out after the committee report found the events that came to light in 2018 revealed a systemic failure of governance at NHS Tayside.

In between, Marra must have missed Prof Chaplain’s entry as he demolished the basis for the whole hysterical mediated frenzy:

The health board was criticised after 304 breast cancer patients were given lower doses of chemotherapy than patients elsewhere in Scotland. But Professor Mark Chaplain says there is international evidence to suggest lower dosages don’t harm patients.

A series of reviews were carried out following the discovery, including one commissioned by the Scottish government which concluded Tayside’s approach increased the risk of recurrence for one patient per year as a result and was judged as “being outwith best current practice, and close to being unacceptable”.

But Prof Chaplain, who specialises in analysing mathematical models of cancer growth at the University of St Andrews, pointed to a study in Finland which compared the difference between low and high chemotherapy treatments for breast cancer and found no inferior outcomes for patients on the lower dosages.

https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/uk-scotland-edinburgh-east-fife-48120108

So, from being the avenging angel supporting the ‘armchair oncologists’ review to condemn NHS Tayside’s lower doses and the SNP Government by proxy, she quickly jumps ship when the good prof demolishes that and presents herself as the concerned champion of his work, now happy with those same the lower doses she so recently condemned, and tries to blame the SNP Government for delays in duplicating his evidence?

Published by johnrobertson834

Retired Professor of Media Politics Not-for-profit independent political analysis

One thought on “Jenny Marra’s humungous hypocrisy as she slides to the other side on NHS Tayside’s breast cancer treatment

  1. Jenny Marra had probably just read the rather telling critique of labour branch office in Scotland’s performance carried in the latest piece from The Centre On Constitutional Change (link and snippets below) and reckoned to herself that she better double down on her hypocrisy to try and cover a few more tracks.

    https://www.centreonconstitutionalchange.ac.uk/news-and-opinion/labour-party-devolution

    The Labour Party since Devolution

    Published: 29 October 2019

    Author: Centre on Constitutional Change

    In the famous words of Lord George Robertson, former Labour Defence Secretary and General Secretary of NATO, devolution was supposed to “kill nationalism stone dead.” In the early years of the Scottish Parliament, he appeared correct: devolution entrenched Labour rule in Scotland, with the party in government with the Liberal Democrats from 1999 to 2007. But since then, it has been downhill all the way, with a succession of dismal election results. Labour secured just 22.6% of the vote in the 2016 Holyrood elections, 27.1% in the 2017 Westminster elections (remarkably spun as a positive result), before hitting rock bottom (it hopes) earlier this year with less than 10% of the total vote in the European Parliament elections, a result that failed to yield a single seat. From its long-held position as Scotland’s premier political force, Labour has been relegated to the humiliating status of 5th place, and is starring irrelevance hard in the face.

    Far from ‘killing nationalism stone dead’ by moving the principal arena of Scottish politics from Westminster to Holyrood, devolution has promoted a distinctive Scottish political sensibility: the sense that Scotland has its own identity, interests, values and priorities, that set it apart from the rest of the UK and require discrete and emphatic political expression. The effect has been to make Scottish voters more receptive to the SNP’s message that, faced with the might of Westminster, Scotland needs an unambiguously and exclusively Scottish party to act as its champion; a party that will always and unerringly “stand up for Scotland”.

    Like

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out /  Change )

Google photo

You are commenting using your Google account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.

Talking-up Scotland

Counter- propaganda and Citizen Journalism since 2014

michaelgreenwell.wordpress.com/

So long as men worship the Caesars and Napoleons, Caesars and Napoleons will duly arise and make them miserable. - Aldous Huxley

Wings Over Scotland

sentiment without action is the ruin of the soul

caltonjock

Scottish and Uk Politics

%d bloggers like this: