As Burnham wriggles and misleads on slavery compensation, Scotland’s 0.05% elites should pay up

Andy Burnham, yesterday, misunderstands the nature of slavery in the former English Empire with: “I do not think that British people today can be held liable for historical wrongs, however heinous, that happened in a different age under different laws and in which they played no personal part.” Nobody, Andy, you know that, thinks ‘the British people’ can be held liable. What percentage of the UK population benefited so significantly from the Atlantic slave trade to the extent they today have such wealth from it that they might be expected to contribute to compensation? The Register of British Slave-Traders identifies … Continue reading As Burnham wriggles and misleads on slavery compensation, Scotland’s 0.05% elites should pay up

Burns had no connection to the slave trade and wrote the most powerful words against it

The Times titillates with a headline today designed to cast doubt on the basis for Scots’ love for Robert Burns. There is nothing there. In short, direct or indirect economic benefit from Caribbean slavery was widespread among the artistic, collecting, and intellectual classes of the period. Burns’ case—an abandoned plan in period of despair with no material outcome is nothing of substance by comparison with the documented ownership, inheritance, investment, and patronage links of figures such as Beckford, Turner, Raeburn, and Reynolds. Many of us will look back with sadness, perhaps shame, at episodes in our lives or of those … Continue reading Burns had no connection to the slave trade and wrote the most powerful words against it