How Scottish Government caution on rental schemes has prevented e-bike/scooter chaos, injury and death

From the Guardian today:

Thousands of ebikes seized by London councils as anger rises over blocked paths – Erik Matthies, policy lead at the Royal National Institute of Blind People, said the rise in abandoned ebikes was overwhelming blind and partially sighted people, as well as elderly people and wheelchair users.

“People are having collisions and injuries due to bikes left on the pavement, and the problem is getting worse,” he said. “There are blind people who tell us they do not go out on their own any more and they do not make journeys that they used to.” https://www.theguardian.com/uk-news/2026/sep/12/ebikes-seized-london-blocked-paths-lime-forest-voi

Hearing much of this in Scotland? No? Here’s why:

NOTE - I know much of this is re-pasted from earlier posts on this topic. First, the bias, the targets, the Unionist claims that TuS seeks to rebut, are repeats of the same themes used by the media and opposition parties to undermine the Scottish Government, SNP and wider movement. Our primary purpose is to keep you ready to rebut in your own world and to cover the wide range of possibilities as efficiently as we can. Also, only a very small percentage (<5%?) of our social media following ever open the full blog post.

When you compare the number of casualties involving e-bikes.

In 2024, the UK, saw 1 390 casualties.1

With 8% of the population, you might then expect around 111 casualties in Scotland.

There were 18, one sixth of the level.2

Why might this be?

I suppose weather will be a factor but the lack of legal government-backed trials in Scotland, even regulated, with speed limits, geofencing, insurance, and age checks have not increased exposure in high-traffic urban areas here, keeping casualties down here.3

Has the Scottish Government been criticised for a lack of rental trials and keeping casualties down? Indeed. The Scotsman, no surprise there:

So, the SNP Government can be accused by some, well all of the media, for not supporting this exciting new initiative and in so doing keeping us all safe. They’ll need to work on the wording for that one.

Sources:

  1. https://www.gov.uk/government/statistics/reported-road-casualties-great-britain-e-scooter-factsheet-2024/reported-road-casualties-great-britain-e-scooter-factsheet-2024
  2. https://www.gov.scot/publications/foi-202500485456/
  3. https://zagdaily.com/micromobility/five-years-of-uk-e-scooter-trials-what-are-the-lessons-learned/

Scottish Government’s reluctance to support and caution on e-bike/scooter trials will have massively reduced traumatic brain injuries

Here it is:

In the Guardian 7 August 2026, the above, and:

Electric scooter riders are three times more likely to suffer traumatic brain injuries than motorcyclists, according to an analysis of accidents in England and Wales – which found women were particularly at risk of serious harm.

Brain injuries accounted for more than a third of adult injuries on e-scooters, but riders also sustained more internal organ and blood vessel damage than did motorcyclists or pedal cyclists, the study found.

The government has backed trials of rental e-scooters in England since 2020, but an additional 1m or so e-scooters are privately owned in the UK. These cannot legally be used on public roads, paths or cycle lanes, but police forces across the country have confiscated thousands because their owners were breaking the law.

The accident analysis reveals that women were involved in about a third more collisions than men – and were more than twice as likely to report severe injuries. Children were also at risk with, 16% of e-scooter injuries in under 18s. https://www.theguardian.com/science/2026/aug/06/e-scooters-more-dangerous-than-motorbikes-or-cycles-analysis

While we have no directly equivalent data on brain injuries from e-scooter accidents for Scotland, we can reasonably predict that they are far less common here because we do know that injuries overall are far less common [see above figures] – only one sixth of the level pro rata.


Discover more from Talking-up Scotland

Subscribe to get the latest posts sent to your email.

Leave a comment

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.