Nuclear waste would remain dangerous for 2 000 generations of Scots based on US prof’s prediction

From LA Jolla News, yesterday:

Millions of pounds of spent nuclear fuel will remain in storage at the San Onofre Nuclear Generating Station for decades — and potentially much longer — raising concerns among experts about the long-term health and environmental risks of storing radioactive waste so close to San Diego.

The spent nuclear fuel provided power for two generations of Californians, but its resulting waste will remain hazardous for thousands of years, according to James Day, a professor of geosciences at the Scripps Institution of Oceanography.

“Nuclear power produces waste that goes for possibly as long as 2,000 generations,” Day said. “It’s my job to tell you that, geologically, we must be thinking long-term — generational. How do we use or remove waste that has produced over 40 years of energy?”

This waste was supposed to go somewhere else, but the federal government’s proposal to build an underground repository at Yucca Mountain in Nevada never materialized. The plan stalled in 2010 amid political, public, tribal and legal opposition. The bunker, under consideration since 1987 and costing an estimated $15 billion to develop, remains unbuilt.

https://timesofsandiego.com/environment/2026/08/31/experts-warn-san-onofres-nuclear-waste-could-remain-dangerous-for-2000-generations/

What is the position of the Labour Party on this?

Well, ignoring it but, also:


Discover more from Talking-up Scotland

Subscribe to get the latest posts sent to your email.

Leave a comment

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.