Does Michael Marra still think Andy Burnham should ‘shut up?’

By Liz S

Daily Record 28 September 2025.

“A senior Labour MSP has told wannabe party leader Andy Burnham to “shut up” amid speculation he plans to launch a bid to topple Keir Starmer”

Guess who the ‘senior’ Labour MSP was?

None other than one of the contenders for the Labour Branch office manager’s post i.e. Michael Marra.

Embarrassing now is it not .

That is , it would be embarrassing for any decent politician .

However for a Labour politician , who now stands in the (supposed) ‘leadership’ contest for Labour in Scotland, it will be be no more than yet another self inflicted humiliating faux pas that will be swept under the (now bulging Labour) carpet.

So then , as a past incident, it will most likely never be referred to again (especially by the media).

However for us it will be hilarious if Marra does indeed win the Labour Branch office manager’s contest.

If that does happen then Burnham should ask Marra if he still wants him to “shut up” , now that he, Burnham, has indeed “toppled Keir Starmer” as the Labour HQ leader.

In fact if Marra does win and so becomes the branch office manager in Scotland then he will have to squirm and pledge allegiance to Burnham as Labour HQ’s new boss.

To make matters worse , that is WORSE FOR MARRA , he will also have to then say how great Burnham is as the new Labour HQ boss/PM .

This past situation where Marra had previously opened his big gob in 2025 to chastise Burnham tells you that he, just like Anas Sarwar, is completely useless as a politician.

No political savvy at all.

I mean surely with everything that was happening with Starmer, including his lack of popularity with the public, then any canny and insightful politician would have seen that the writing was on the wall as far as Starmer’s future leadership hopes being sustained.

So if Marra wins, then straight from the off , he will be seen as being in a really embarrassing position based on what he previously said to the now new PM , Andy Burnham , i.e. he told him to “Shut up”.

It would be even more delicious to get to hear his reasons for being so RUDE and DISMISSIVE (Ha Ha) to Burnham, just for him to try to save face.

Seems to me that Michael Marra did not like Andy Burnham, as why would Marra be so quick to call him out.

If Marra does win then I am sure Andy Burnham will be absolutely delighted Ha Ha.

We also hear that Jackie Baillie is behind Joe Fagan (scary) , as she thinks that we the public will assume that as he has no (supposed) political baggage as a ‘new face’ (new MSP) for Labour at Holyrood , so then she will (wrongly) assume that will then somehow make him seem like a better candidate.

Well I read Fagan’s Wikipedia page and some of it , for me, did not make comfortable reading, nor I am sure would it be comfortable for him to read either nor for the Labour party to read.

As it seems that he, Fagan, does indeed have some historical political baggage.

I mean of course he does , after all he is a Labour politician. (they all have political baggage , that is once you do some research on them).

Now I see that The National has a story on Joe Fagan (Jackie’s candidate), with a headline that states:

“Labour leadership hopeful presided over ‘severe bullying’ Councillor claims” (the Councillor who states this is a fellow Labour Councillor) – and this story backs up what was written on Fagan’s Wikipedia page.

So basically both Marra and Fagan are now somewhat tainted by their past, not surprised as that is what you always get with Labour.

(The clue with Fagan was the fact that Jackie Baillie was backing him, so that confirmed to me that there just had to be some (alleged) dodgy story to relate about him and his political past).

Labour are such an awful party, at all levels.

Liz S


Discover more from Talking-up Scotland

Subscribe to get the latest posts sent to your email.

3 thoughts on “Does Michael Marra still think Andy Burnham should ‘shut up?’

  1. I’m backing Monica. I’m not a member of the Labour Party so I feel free to say what I like. I don’t even agree with her on some of her daft ideas. But I haven’t a clue who the other two are and their baggage doesn’t surprise me.

    “Scottish” Labour are irrelevant anyway but at least Monica thinks we should have a vote.

    Liked by 1 person

  2. it doesn’t really matter how bad these contenders are. There will still be those thick enough to vote for them.

    less and less though, judging by Labour IN Scotland’s election result and their financial position.

    I’m hopeful that we’re moving towards a situation where Labour is OUT of Scotland.
    John (not anonymous) Lawson

    Like

  3. Saw this was happening in Thetford in Norfolk , as reported by the BBC website:

    “More arrests have been made over disorder linked to anti-immigration protests that saw crowds attempt to storm the homes of suspected asylum seekers and a police officer “seriously bitten”.

    “Asylum seekers were removed from properties in Thetford on Thursday for their own safety, Norfolk Police said”.

    “Protesters attempted to enter homes where they believed asylum seekers were living on Tuesday and Wednesday night, when officers were also “subjected to significant aggression”.

    “Witnesses reported rocks and eggs being thrown and chants of “we want them out” during protests on Clover Way involving up to 200 people on Wednesday night”

    “A male officer was struck with a rock and a female officer was seriously bitten, breaking the skin, the force said”.

    “Scott Hussey, a Reform councillor for the nearby Brecks division on Norfolk County Council described the protest as “spirited” and said there had been “some skirmishes” but said he saw no violence“.

    This violence and unrest has been ongoing for three consecutive nights.

    The Journalist Adam Bienkov posted this yesterday:

    “Journalists attacked with rocks for reporting on racist rioters waging a pogrom whilst calling for refugees to “have their f**king heads chopped off”. These are the “protesters” with “legitimate concerns” we keep on hearing so much about”.

    Meanwhile the rag that is The Daily Express produced this article, (also) yesterday, on Thetford:

    “The jaw dropping list of everything that asylum seekers in Thetford were ‘given for free'”. (where they listed pillowcases, duvets, dinner plates and cutlery).

    Thus a section of the gutter press doing their bit (yet again) to keep the hostility going , not just against asylum seekers, but also it seems against the Police .

    So what say this new supposed different PM Andy Burnham upon this thuggery.

    Well Adam Bienkov produced an article today that stated:

    “Andy Burnham’s Non-Response to the Thetford Pogrom Is His First Big Failure “

    “Whilst happy to opine on ‘vertical drinking’ and whether bread rolls should be called ‘barms’, our new PM has had nothing to say about three days of horrific racist violence on our streets”.

    So just like Starmer , for Burnham, it also seems that some major incidents require no real action and it seems no condemnation as well, as the victims are apparently not to be seen as significant enough to worry about and also the culprits are somehow not to be considered as a threat.

    No change with Burnham in charge, as he is far too busy with his own self promotion via a succession of TikTok videos that are more for his benefit than for us mere mortals .

    Liz S

    Like

Leave a comment

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.