From the wetter parts of Britain to the places that ‘actually need it’

By Liz S

Talking of “Fire” there is another huge problem in certain parts of the UK State , that is where droughts are also currently happening , all as a result of the greatly increased temperatures in some places within the UK state and also due to a lack of rainfall.

There is a digital online travel platform called ‘Exploring GB’.

They posted this on 28 July on Facebook:

“Scotland gets huge amounts of rainfall, while parts of southern England regularly end up facing droughts and hosepipe bans”.

“The Romans were transporting water over vast distances 2,000 years ago. Surely in 2026, we’re capable of getting water from the wetter parts of Britain to the places that actually need it”?

So as well as Scotland currently (pun intended minus the ‘ly’) transferring our surplus renewable energy to England , then this digital travel site also thinks that we should transfer our water to England as well.

Apparently they , Exploring GB, appear to see it as being a case of England’s need(s) being greater than ours, when they stated they wanted to get our Scottish water “to the places that actually need it“, as in it going to England via Scotland.

(No surprise to discover that Exploring GB’s location is in England).

So should that happen, as in we in Scotland did ‘give’ our water to England (or rather the WM government’s takes it) then how long before we in Scotland also eventually begin to experience problems with our water supply ?

That is when we , Scotland, give yet another of our resources to England.

Remember England has a far far larger population to satisfy for their water needs than we do ?

Our reduced population in Scotland means that we have a greater advantage over their population within England, as our abundant resources are more than sufficient to sustain our smaller population within Scotland.

So much for we, Scotland, supposedly needing them more than they need us.

Facts and reality expose a far far different reality.

(Also just look at them all ,as in all of the pro UK politicians, all arguing over our Scottish Oil and Gas in the North sea).

Scotland too small ?

Small, re populations, is actually not a bad thing in so many ways , especially when it comes to having an abundance (excess to needs) of resources to cater for a smaller population.

I fail to see how with all of this evidence of self sufficiency via resources within Scotland that we would then be considered somehow as incapable of surviving (thriving) as an independent country.

#UnionistPropaganda


Discover more from The 'Unstoppable' Talking-up Scotland

Subscribe to get the latest posts sent to your email.

One thought on “From the wetter parts of Britain to the places that ‘actually need it’

  1. They can pay for any water. Better off the illegal Barnett Formula. North/South divide. Scotland paying too much for Westminster debt and poor bad decisions. Spending more public monies in the South. Taking from Scotland irresponsibly.

    Westminster spending too much on nuclear weapons, Trident. Spending £13Billion a year to decommission nuclear. Instead of solar and renewables. Too many people in the South. Expensive congestion. Over use of natural resources. Instead the population more equally divided and spread. On the landscape. Scotland half empty. Scotland depopulated by Westminster policies. Poor, bad economic decisions.

    The South of the UK will soon be under water. Flooded. No Defences. Will have to move North. Plenty of water to come.

    Roman Britain hardly any people in it. The Pict’s deterred too many visitors.

    Like

Leave a comment

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.