Glasgow’s giant hospital is revealed as one of safest in Scotland and far safer than several of NHS England’s really ‘scandal-hit’ hospitals

The Times today is front-paging a story of a floor-cleaning fluid and the apparent lack of clear instructions on its use. Staff have been ‘offered the chance to speak to occupational health.’

Disturbing, I agree. Something should be done, I agree but front page on a major newspaper?

Is it there, only because the hospital in question has been subject to repeated, ill-informed, hyperbolic, claims from Scottish Labour and associating it with the current SNP Government?

Using real, important, data, just how good is the QEUH and compared to other hospitals across the UK not, it seems , ‘scandal -hit?’

From Hospital Standardised Mortality Ratios January 2025 to December 2025 published today, the above chart and:

No hospitals had a significantly higher standardised mortality ratio than the national average.

HSMR acts as a signal, highlighting hospitals where mortality is higher or lower than predicted. This prompts hospitals to review their care processes, check for possible issues and identify areas for improvement.

In Scotland, the national HSMR is set at 1.00. A hospital with an HSMR less than one has fewer deaths observed than predicted within 30 days of admission, whereas an HSMR greater than one indicates more observed deaths than predicted in the same period. https://www.publichealthscotland.scot/publications/hospital-standardised-mortality-ratios/hospital-standardised-mortality-ratios-january-2025-to-december-2025/

The above funnel chart allows the presentation of hospitals with widely varying sizes on one illustrative image. The blue dot at the extreme right is the so-called Queen Elisabeth University Hospital in Glasgow and those to the left are the tiny ‘county’ hospitals such as those in the Borders and the Western Isles. The QEUH had an HMSR of 0.94 and 200 fewer deaths than predicted. The QEUH has had this level for years now and is thus, objectively, not ‘troubled’ , as much as Anas Sarwar and Scottish Labour might wish it was.

Things are very different in England, with a clear postcode lottery:

Look above at the clustering of high high mortality (mid blue) in the north and of low mortality (pale blue) in the more affluent south.

Look below at the 10 English hospitals with significantly higher, above 1.2, mortality rates:

Blackpool, 1.31, had 600 more deaths than predicted. Medway 1.29, had 400 more deaths than predicted. All ten are in the North other than one in Norfolk and one in Coventry.

While, in Scotland, you need not worry where you are treated, there are hospitals in England you might want to avoid.

Source: https://digital.nhs.uk/data-and-information/publications/statistical/shmi/2026-04


Discover more from Talking-up Scotland

Subscribe to get the latest posts sent to your email.

2 thoughts on “Glasgow’s giant hospital is revealed as one of safest in Scotland and far safer than several of NHS England’s really ‘scandal-hit’ hospitals

  1. The QEUH campus is enclosed on two sides by sewage plants – the Waste Water Treatment Works (WWTW) to the north across Renfrew Road and the almost equally large Shieldhall Waste Transfer Station (SWTS) directly contiguous with the QEUH campus to the west and in plain sight as one walks along the Hospital Boulevard! SWTS receives vast quantities of raw sewage now including waste from the Shieldhall Sewage Tunnel and removes unprocessable material before passing raw sewage to the interconnected WWTW. The QEUH should have been sited at the former Cowglen Hospital but Greater Glasgow Health Board (GGHB) all but ignored the results of its own consultation during April to September 2000 and received approval from successive Scottish Labour Health Ministers, the official sign-off being given by Malcolm Chisholm in 2002 (http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/uk_news/scotland/2188390.stm). It would be nice to see Anas Sarwar acknowledge this – his father Chaudhry Sarwar was MP for the area (1997-2005) and all decisions regarding the siting of the QEUH and RHCG had been completed before Labour left power in 2007. It is not clear how deals were conducted with the house builders at Cowglen…does anyone know?

    Like

    1. I am certainly no expert on the best location of new hospitals and never will be, but being close to a sewage plant and I believe a new incinerator being built over the M8 is not, in my mind the best place for that hospital.

      However, one thing we can be sure is that the “Scottish” media will brand this as an SNP failure, even though the decision to build it there in the first place was Labour.

      Imagine paying £3.20 for a printed copy of the Times!

      Stephen McKenzie

      Like

Leave a comment

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.