The Herald and other media wailing at new constraints on their journalists wandering Holyrood and mobbing ministers, fail to tell you this.

Holyrood access still remains more transparent overall than Westminster, even after the recent media pen change.

The new restriction is narrow and targeted. It’s only after First Minister’s Questions, in one specific area. Westminster’s system is much more controlled.

Why Holyrood Is Still More Transparent

There is broader general access. Accredited journalists at Holyrood have significant freedom to move around the building, approach MSPs in public areas and can conduct impromptu interviews.

The media pen is limited. It applies only after FMQs. Politicians can still approach journalists there.

There are fewer accreditation barriers: Access is generally easier for a wider range of journalists compared to Westminster’s stricter pass system.

Westminster Remains More Restrictive

The lobby system means that only accredited lobby journalists get privileged access to the Members’ Lobby for mingling with MPs.

Filming and movement is heavily regulated to specific broadcasting points.

There are tighter rules on accreditation with passes prioritising established outlets and regular coverage. Freelancers and smaller operations face more hurdles.

To sum up, Holyrood’s change makes post-FMQs interactions slightly more managed so closer to Westminster in that one area, but the Scottish Parliament retains a more open, accessible ethos for journalists overall.