Holyrood’s Real Public Servants vs One Very Dubious Charity Case

Ministers’ salaries are made up of two elements – their pay as an MSP and a separate ministerial salary reflecting their responsibilities within government.
Since the start of the freeze, they have declined to take their full combined pay entitlement – with about £2.2m of public spending saved as a result since 2009.
https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/articles/cgenrjxj05lo

By Jim Mennie:

SNP cabinet ministers have returned nearly £2 million in pay with full audit trails. Reform’s Malcolm Offord promised his entire salary to a trust he alone controls — one the Scottish charity regulator has now opened a formal inquiry into.

SNP cabinet ministers have voluntarily frozen the ministerial part of their pay at 2008-09 levels for 17 years. They take the full legal salary but immediately return the excess straight to the Scottish Government for public spending — over £1.94 million returned by March 2024, projected to hit £2.64 million by 2026.

Fully auditable: The figures come from official Scottish Government FOI responses (e.g. FOI-202500451978) and are absorbed into audited public accounts checked annually by Audit Scotland. Anyone can request their own FOI for proof — it’s black-and-white government records, not party spin.

Reform’s approach (Malcolm Offord only):

The sole notable pledge is from Reform Scotland leader Malcolm Offord, who said he would donate his entire MSP salary (~£78,000/year) to the Badenoch Trust. No other Reform MSP has done anything similar, and there is no party-wide policy. Emphasis on Offord’s arrangement.

This has been widely criticised as a less-than-admirable scam. Offord personally controls the tiny Badenoch Trust (director, secretary, and controlling trustee; the only other trustee is his personal assistant). The charity is registered only in England & Wales, operates from his Edinburgh office, and was never registered with OSCR (Scotland’s regulator) despite operating solely in Scotland. OSCR opened a formal inquiry in May 2026 and ordered it to register. No donations have been publicly confirmed yet. Critics call it self-dealing: public money routed through a vehicle Offord controls with minimal oversight and clear regulatory breach.

Pros & Cons comparison

SNP approach

Pros: Long-term (17 years), collective, fully transparent and auditable, money goes directly to the public purse — genuine, verifiable sacrifice.

Cons: Limited to ministers only; total sum modest compared to Scotland’s budget; partial U-turn in 2025 looks opportunistic.

Reform/Offord approach

Pros: Bolder on paper — full salary donation.

Cons: Individual only, unproven, routed through a self-controlled charity in regulatory breach — lacks independence, transparency, and credibility. Far more optics than substance.

Bottom line: The SNP’s policy is clearly the stronger, more admirable, and fully auditable example of politician restraint. Offord’s pledge collapses under scrutiny into something far more dubious.


Discover more from The 'Unstoppable' Talking-up Scotland

Subscribe to get the latest posts sent to your email.

Leave a comment

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.