Professor John Robertson OBA
The news that the 309 young male asylum seekers arriving in Inverness are going to lead to veterans [three families] being booted out of Cameron Barracks in Inverness is only being covered by the right-wing media. I share the view that these families should absolutely be able to stay but there are other, bigger, reasons too.
From BBC Highlands and Islands, 29 October 2025
A UK government minister says he recognises the “strength of feeling” about plans to use an Inverness barracks to house asylum seekers. Cameron Barracks is to provide accommodation for 309 men from next month, according to local Lib Dem MP Angus MacDonald. At Westminster, Mr MacDonald challenged Minister of State at the Home Office Alex Norris on the suitability of the site near Inverness city centre. Norris said any impact on communities would be “minimised” and the security of people living in surrounding areas was “paramount”. https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/articles/cx27x1k2rkmo
Two questions arise.
First, how sensible is this move on the light of the current county Lines drugs epidemic with 10 English gangs operating in Inverness brining a sharp increase in drug abuse, drug death, extreme violence, prostitution, child abuse and people trafficking to the city? More on this at:
Second, is there any evidence than any of illegal migrants arriving on the south coast did so with the intention of settling in Scotland?
Here is the answer based on a Grok AI response:
No, there are no credible reports of migrants arriving via small boats across the English Channel who explicitly express a desire to settle in Scotland rather than England (or elsewhere in the UK). Small boat crossings overwhelmingly target southeast England (e.g., Dover, Kent), driven by proximity to France, smuggling networks, and perceptions of better opportunities in London’s economy or family ties in England. Once in the UK, asylum seekers are processed nationwide, with the Home Office dispersing them—including to Scotland—based on accommodation availability, not individual preferences for Scotland. Explicit preferences for Scotland are rare and undocumented in public reports; available evidence points to England as the primary destination.This conclusion is based on extensive searches of news archives, government data, and social media discussions up to October 30, 2025. Below, I outline key findings, motivations for crossings, and related dispersal trends.Key Motivations for Small Boat CrossingsMigrants cite economic opportunities, English language familiarity, and existing communities as reasons for targeting the UK, but specifics favor England:
- Economic and Community Ties: A 2023 La Croix analysis (French Catholic newspaper) detailed interviews with Channel crossers, emphasizing London’s job market, diaspora networks (e.g., in construction, hospitality), and easier integration in England over rural or northern UK areas. No mentions of Scotland.
- Language and Urban Pull: BBC and Guardian reports (2023–2025) highlight that many from Iran, Afghanistan, Syria, and Sudan aim for cities like London or Manchester, where English-speaking jobs and support networks exist. Scotland’s colder climate, smaller economy, and Gaelic influences are not cited as draws.
- Smuggling Routes: Crossings are organized via Calais-Dover, with no viable direct routes to Scotland (e.g., North Sea crossings are longer, stormier, and unfeasible for small dinghies).
No reports (e.g., from Home Office stats, Refugee Council, or media like The Times/BBC) document migrants stating “Scotland” as their target during crossings or initial screenings.Dispersal to Scotland: Policy, Not PreferenceScotland receives ~10% of UK asylum housing despite its 8% population share, but this is involuntary:
- Home Office Contracts: Since 2000, Glasgow has housed thousands under a £1.2bn UK-wide deal. Recent expansions (2024–2025) include barracks in Inverness and Stirling for ~2,000 small boat arrivals, per The Times (Oct 28, 2025). Migrants are bused north (up to 500 miles) post-landing, often without choice.
- Low Settlement Rates: Only ~15–20% of dispersed asylum seekers stay in Scotland long-term if granted status, per Migration Scotland data (2024). Many relocate south for jobs/family, indicating low explicit desire to settle north.
- Political Tensions: In 2022, UK minister Robert Jenrick accused Scotland of “refusing” small boat migrants, but fact-checks showed dispersal was occurring—just not at Scotland’s preferred scale. SNP rhetoric welcomes refugees but criticizes forced placements straining housing.
| Factor | Evidence of Preference for Scotland? | Typical Destination Preference |
|---|---|---|
| Crossing Route | No; 99% land in SE England (Home Office, 2025). | England (Dover/Kent intake units). |
| Initial Claims | No explicit statements in screenings (Guardian/BBC interviews, 2021–2025). | UK-wide asylum, but ties to English cities. |
| Long-Term Settlement | Low retention (15–20% stay post-grant, Migration Scotland 2024). | England (e.g., London: 40% of grants). |
| Media/Social Reports | Zero direct quotes; X posts speculate on policy, not migrant intent. | Economic hubs in England. |
Broader Context and Why No Reports?
- Data Gaps: Home Office publishes aggregate stats (e.g., 36,816 small boat arrivals in 2024; 90% claim asylum, 70%+ granted), but not granular “destination preferences.” Refugee orgs like Scottish Refugee Council focus on integration, not pre-arrival wishes.
- Public Opinion: Scottish polls (Migration Policy Scotland, 2024) show 66% support for long-term labor migrant settlement, but this is general—not tied to small boats. X discussions (e.g., #SmallBoats) emphasize England’s “chaos” spilling north, not migrant enthusiasm for Scotland.
- Rare Exceptions: Isolated anecdotes (e.g., 2021 Guardian on Afghan families dispersed to Glasgow) note adaptation, but no pre-crossing intent. No verified cases of migrants risking Channel boats specifically for Scotland.
If new reports emerge (e.g., via Home Office transparency), they could surface in outlets like BBC Scotland or The National. For now, the evidence confirms small boat migrants seek UK entry broadly, with England as the implicit focus.
Sources at: https://x.com/i/grok?conversation=1983960217889931335
Talking-up Scotland 'Albatraz' 
I look at the Tory benches thinking how many are contemplating jumping ship to Reform before next year’s election which I guess is why the RW media are spending all the lovely £000k donations they are getting from billionaires.
Robbo
LikeLiked by 1 person
What I never see in MSM articles on immigration is any indication of where these people are coming from and why.
Maybe if the Westminster government stopped bombing and sanctioning these countries, and don’t forget Gaza, Iraq and Libya, there wouldn’t be these vast flows of migrants escaping the death and destruction.
Foreign policy is a reserved matter. Dealing with the consequences rests with Westminster.
LikeLiked by 2 people
Spot on!
John
LikeLike
Exactly Capella.
The MSM prefer to film those who protest outside hotels housing these people rather than interviewing the people inside the hotels and so getting their stories.
Then of course the MSM also film the small boats that land on the English coastline., as if an invasion.
While constantly amplifying the hostile message of Nigel Farage.
How about some documentaries or extended news reports telling people within the UK why these people came here.
Communicate their stories of where they came from and why.
Then dispel the fake news that Farage and GB News are communicating that states that all of those who come here in small boats only come here to harm people in the UK, also that they only come here to take ‘our’ jobs while also to get Welfare Benefits.
As to the UK government, well it behaves totally irresponsibly and helps to spread the disinformation via their hostile attitude that they, the UK government are communicating on Immigrants, that, of course, is what Farage wants the public to hear and so believe , which then helps him, Farage, and also his party to gain support and credibility.
That’s the kind of hostile environment that both Farage and Starmer are creating within their UK (England) ………as are much of the MSM too….in them , as a MSM, promoting and so also joining in with their fake message of wanting to make their Britain ‘Great again’……and that will not be a Britain that will be open and welcoming to……..Foreigners.
Liz s
LikeLiked by 1 person
The short answer to the question in your headline about right wing papers is that they are xenophobic and racist and are seeking to foment local strife. It is an example of the divide-and-rule tactics which the right wing has used for all of its history. It diverts attention from the pillaging, rent-seeking behaviour which exemplifies the class of people who lead these parties and who run the media and who ‘own’ many MPs and much of the civil service.
These media give only a distorted version of the humanitarian arguments for dealing humanely with people seeking asylum. People who are travelling thousands of miles to cross the English Channel in small, overcrowded boats are doing so in search a safer life because the actions of the west and its proxies have resulted in centuries of destruction of local communities and the pillaging of their natural resources. Climate change, caused largely by industrialisation in the west using pillaged energy sources has wrought significant damage to the local climate and destroyed much of the subsistence possibilities of local people.
The self proclaimed ‘progressives’ in the west have failed to acknowledge properly the impact that large numbers of people from overseas has on local services and have failed to support services in local communities – housing, school, health services, social work, etc – services which have been depleted by the con-trick that is ‘austerity’. Successive Westminster (and, sadly, Holyrood) governments have, over the decades disempowered local governments, so that they are unable to support local people in adjusting to change, not least by ensuring they have sufficient income to meet their needs.
LikeLiked by 1 person