Scotland’s Fort Apache, Fort George, should be recycled

Professor John Robertson OBA

Fort George, Scotland’s very own Fort Apache is apparently at risk again. It was under threat four years ago:

In the Times 17 October 2021:

Up to 1,700 soldiers could be axed in Scotland as the Ministry of Defence seeks to cut costs and create a leaner army to meet the demands of the cyber era. Three of Scotland’s seven garrisons face closure in cuts to be announced by the end of the year. Fort George near Inverness, home to the Black Watch, and the Glencorse and Redford barracks in Edinburgh were scheduled to close by 2032 but army chiefs want to speed up the plans. A regiment of Royal Engineers at Kinloss may relocate to England. The moves could see the number of regular soldiers based in Scotland being cut from 3,700 to 2,000.https://www.thetimes.co.uk/article/three-scottish-barracks-may-shut-in-army-cyber-move-dfw5wg7c5

There are only 3 700 soldiers based in Scotland? Out of 82 230 full-time? 4.5% for more than 8% of the population?

The cyber era? To hack the Russians or to hack us?

Many readers will have read of the 77th Brigade of ‘Facebook warriors’ and their alleged interference in the 2014 Referendum:

https://ukdefencejournal.org.uk/politician-claims-that-british-army-77th-brigade-are-attacking-scots-online/

However, it was the proposed closure of Fort George that caught my eye.

Here’s what the Aberdeen-based Press & Journal thinks:

‘Fort George closure would cost Highland economy millions of pounds. Plans to close the historic Fort George barracks could cost the Highland economy £14million a year and lead to the loss of more than 100 jobs, it has emerged.’

Further down, the PJ reports:

 ‘Built after the Battle of Culloden, the garrison has been the home of the famous 500-strong Black Watch battalion for almost a decade, and also houses the regimental museum for The Highlanders.’

The campaign to save the fort has full cross-party support including that of newly-appointed Depute-Leader of the SNP, Angus Robertson. Is he biased? Like some of my Robertson ancestors, some of his probably got jobs with the Black Watch helping to keep the other tribes down, on behalf of the German, House of Hanover, UK monarchy at the time…..and still today? And, his mother is German and he speaks German fluently. He needs to declare any interests on this one.

I’m going out on a limb here, I know, but why don’t we think differently about this and similar historical sites? You could see them as places best forgotten rather than preserved. I began to think this way during a visit to North Wales with it’s impossible-to-ignore string of massive Norman castles. They are big ugly and physically dominating things just at face value but if you think what they were for, it’s much worse. These 12th Century monstrosities were built to dominate the Welsh, to remind them of their inferior status and were places of torture and imprisonment. It’s important to remember too that they were part of a wider domination of the Anglo-Saxons/English by a brutal French-speaking warrior elite just at the beginning of their imperial expansion.

More than four hundred years later, that imperial project had just finished off the last element of resistance in mainland Britain, the tribes of the Scottish Highlands. After victory by an imperial army at Culloden in 1746, the clans were ‘pacified’. This brutal process of punishment, humiliation and killing is today well-known. As with the Welsh, centuries before, Celtic cultural expression was banned and a chain of great forts was built to maintain control of the ‘tribes’. They are still with us today as Fort William, Fort Augustus and Fort George. Going further in the humiliation for the local population than was the case in Wales, they take the names of British aristocrats and have become the place-names of the settlements they stand in.

Less than two centuries later, a more fully genocidal project but with its roots still in Anglo-Norman imperialism was to put down many more forts across the lands of the aboriginal tribes of North America. Fort Apache is the best known but there are many more.

Is Fort George just our Fort Apache? Would the descendants of the Apache like to pay taxes for its preservation, I wonder?

Back to today, have I changed my views? Nope. Knock it down and recycle the stone.

Talking-up Scotland's special crowd funder has closed but you can support at any time at: https://www.crowdfunder.co.uk/checkout/help-talking-up-scotland-tell-truth-about-scotland/payment/nBQxjVzq/details or by direct bank transfer method - Bernadette/John Robertson, Sort code 08-91-04, Account 12266421

9 thoughts on “Scotland’s Fort Apache, Fort George, should be recycled

  1. Spot on! If not knocked down at least renamed back to its Gaelic name and converted into a remembrance centre or perhaps a home for all those refugees forced to flee their own homeland because of British government policy.

    Liked by 4 people

  2. When territorial waters are included, Scotland accounts for 51% of the area of the United Kingdom. From a NATO/military point of view Scotland is strategically very important because the Atlantic between Iceland and Scotland is a major route for submarines and surface vessels.

    Liked by 4 people

  3. English army Redford barracks in Edinburgh takes up huge pieces of land, outskirts of the city, amazing views, etc, who owns it? It could be better used for social housing but you know what will happen, it’ll be sold off to private developers to build houses for the rich.
    As for the rest, what’s the real BritNats’ agenda?

    Liked by 1 person

  4. 180,000 military personnel. 10,000 based in Scotland. Pro rata should be 18,000. Trident dumped in Scotland. £Billions spent on redundant weaponry. Contracts not delivered. Then on to the next one. Total waste of monies. Illegal wars. Oil wars. Scotland Oil & Gas revenues wasted.

    Scotland needs to be Independent to get the benefit. EU shared Defence costs.

    Angus Robertson’s wife. Chancer.

    Like

  5. SCOTLAND NEEDS TO KICK OUT ALL UNIONISTS WHO WANT TO DESTROY SCOTLANDS HISTORY

    AS IF THE HIGHLAND CLEARANCES WERE NOT ENOUGH

    NOW THEY WANT TO REVISIT. THEIR PREVIOUS CLEARANCES

    BECAUSE IT IS COSTING TO MUCH MONEY

    WE SCOTS WILL USE OUR ASSET RICH COUNTRY TO DECIDE

    WHAT WE WILL RESTORE

    Like

Leave a reply to Anonymous Cancel reply

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.