After 60 years of nuclear power generation and unknown further decades to make the sites ‘safe’ Ayrshire does not need the new risk and contamination Scottish Labour offers it

The Labour candidate for Central Ayrshire, Alan Gemmell, is a ‘proud GMB member.’ The GMB union helped found [i] the Labour Party, funds it [ii] and is the union for nuclear industry workers. Gemmell is a certain recipient of that funding. The other two candidates, Irene Campbell for North Ayrshire where the Hunterston power station is located and Elaine Stewart for Ayr, Carrick and Cumnock, will be obliged to follow the UK Labour line supporting the building of new stations.

Hunterston A was commissioned in 1964 and taken out of service in 1990 but full clearance of the site will not happen before 2080.[iii]

Hunterston B was commissioned in 1976 and began defueling in 2022 but a date for full site clearance is not apparent. [iv] Radioactive isotopes in the soil will remain active for a very long time. For example, one isotope, Plutonium-239, has a half-life of 24 000 years, by which time only half of the radioactivity will have gone!

There have been many reports of leaks over the long timespan, from the two power stations, into the Clyde estuary and into the atmosphere near several villages and towns.

In September 2009, the Sunday Herald reported that ‘thousands of litres of radioactive waste’ had leaked into the Clyde and that the Scottish Environmental Protection Agency (SEPA) had accused the station of six breaches of legal promises it had made to the local population and environment.[v]

Highly toxic spent fuel flasks from Hunterston were taken by road and rail through Ayrshire to the Sellafield reprocessing plant in Cumbria every 2 or 3 days. [vi] This may be ongoing.

Most official research into the health effects of living near Hunterston A and B has found, according to the researchers, no significant risks and, in particular no evidence of unusual levels of cancers.

For example, research by Aberdeen University in 1999 did find that more tumours (14%) of the nervous system were observed than expected within 25km of Hunterston but this was considered to be not statistically significant.[vii]

However, in 1987 the British Medical Journal reported on childhood leukaemia in West Berkshire and North Hampshire, within 10km of the Atomic Weapons Research Establishment at Aldermaston and the nearby Royal Ordnance factory, finding 29 cases among 0–4-year-olds when only 14.4 were expected based on national levels and 41 cases among 0–14-year-olds when only 28.6 were expected. [viii]

Then, in 1989, research by Southampton General Hospital found that the suggestion of raised cancer levels among young people around the Sellafield ‘has been supported by the findings’ [ix]. Contaminated effluent from the Sellafield reprocessing plant in Cumbria, described as ‘Europe’s most hazardous nuclear site’ [x], is carried by prevailing currents around the Ayrshire coast only a few miles away.

Much more dramatic, in 2002, the Guardian reported cancer rates in parts of Somerset, 5 miles downwind of the Hinkley Point plant, up to 6 times higher than the national average. [xi]

Then, in 2015, peer-reviewed research found breast cancer risks at up to 6 times higher than average around nuclear power stations in Wales and England. [xii]

The same researchers looked at breast cancer risk in Essex and found higher rates in disadvantaged areas than more affluent areas, near Bradwell power station.

Returning to the ‘official data’ recording levels of radioactivity in sediment, in soil or in life-forms, none can seriously doubt the accuracy of these but what we can legitimately do is question the safety of these levels of contamination. We can do this because they vary from country to country and over time so, by definition, are subjectively based, often influenced by economic priorities. The safe level for radioactivity in food in the EU is currently 370Bq/Kg for infants and for other foodstuff, it is 600. [xiii] In the UK, post Chernobyl it was 1 000 [xiv] and across the EU including Britain, post Fukushima for Japanese imports, it was 100 for general foods and 50 for infant products.[xv]

We have seen historically the scientific community fail to protect the public from the devastating effects of tobacco, asbestos, Thalidomide and, more recently, Primodos. The nuclear industry and the associated weapons development is an enormously powerful political and economic force. Scientists working in research centres and universities funded by government grants face powerful inhibitory pressures when it comes to doing any research that might undermine them. A powerful cultural predisposition against finding evidence of harm, against questioning the setting of ‘safe’ levels of exposure, overwhelms all but a very few and the latter do not last long.

The voters in Ayrshire and across Scotland need to think about this before voting Labour.


[i] https://www.gmb.org.uk/networks/politics/winning-for-working-people

[ii] https://www.gmb.org.uk/campaigns/voteyes/

[iii] https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Hunterston_A_nuclear_power_station

[iv] https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Hunterston_B_nuclear_power_station

[v] https://www.robedwards.com/2009/09/revealed-radioactive-waste-leak-from-hunterston.html

[vi] https://www.ayradvertiser.com/news/15546135.concern-at-nuclear-waste-on-south-ayrshire-railways/

[vii] https://www.jstor.org/stable/27731111

[viii] https://acrobat.adobe.com/id/urn:aaid:sc:EU:2936bac7-ec76-4120-a9af-0a1825b41a65

[ix] https://www.jstor.org/stable/2983129

[x] https://www.theguardian.com/business/2023/dec/05/sellafield-nuclear-site-leak-could-pose-risk-to-public#:~:text=Sellafield%2C%20Europe’s%20most%20hazardous%20nuclear,public%2C%20the%20Guardian%20can%20reveal.

[xi] https://www.theguardian.com/politics/2002/jul/14/greenpolitics.science

[xii]https://www.academia.edu/95797729/Breast_Cancer_Mortality_in_Estuary_Wards_near_Bradwell_Nuclear_Power_Station_Essex_UK_2001_1995?uc-sb-sw=83553679

[xiii] https://measurlabs.com/blog/eu-regulations-on-food-contaminants/#:~:text=Most%20meat%20products%2C%20fats%2C%20and,3%20mg%2Fkg%20in%20supplements.

[xiv] https://www.reading.ac.uk/foodlaw/news/uk-09047.htm

[xv] https://www.pref.fukushima.lg.jp/site/portal-english/en01-03.html

11 thoughts on “After 60 years of nuclear power generation and unknown further decades to make the sites ‘safe’ Ayrshire does not need the new risk and contamination Scottish Labour offers it

  1. THE UNIONISM IN AYRSHIRE ARE HELL BENT ON CONTAMINATING A BEAUTIFUL
    PART OF SCOTLAND
    AS THEY DID WHEN THEY BUILT DOUNREY NUCLEAR POWER STATION
    AND SUBSEQUENTLY CONTAMINATED A HUGE AREA OF SEAFRONT

    IS THIS WHAT TRUE SCOTS WANT
    OR ARE THEY BEING FORCED BY A FOREIGN NATION
    TO BE SUBSERVIENTVAND POOR

    Liked by 2 people

  2. I suggest any party attempting to sell nuclear produced energy to the Scottish electorate is on a losing strategy even if it does protect some local jobs…

    Liked by 2 people

      1. I was thinking more on the Con that nuclear was for what are now the elderly, ‘so clean and cheap it won’t be worth billing for…’, that didn’t age well either..

        It’s now common knowledge nuclear is far and away the most expensive electricity money can buy – It’s now common knowledge power interconnects both built and planned, as well as grid upgrades have a singular purpose, to deliver power south from renewables… – It’s now common knowledge Scots consumers nearest the point of production of renewables are paying the highest bills in the UK through a “market concept” created over 30 years ago in the infancy of “windmills” on such scale….

        It’s now common knowledge ‘nuclear power’ is dead to Scots, but their offspring are still going to be dealing with it’s legacy for many generations to come, assuming London’s politicians don’t destroy the planet first..

        Gemmell may well be “a ‘proud GMB member.’ “, but he’d need to be as thick as mince (Andrew Bowie ?) to try that one on even in Ayrshire… 😉
        Slightly OT – I hear there is a David Bowie tribute act touring with Bowie’s original “A lad insane” concept, an act which might go down well in such as Banchory – All it needs are a few choice enunciations, a smirk, false bat ears, could be a sell-out…

        Liked by 1 person

  3. Westminster Gov is spending £13Billion a year on decommissioning nuclear for ten years. £130Billion. Still increasing. They plan to build more. Scotland does not need nuclear or the waste dumped here. Get rid of it.

    Get rid of the Westminster poor, bad decisions in Scotland. Vote for Independence. For a more cohesive, equal and prosperous society.

    Liked by 1 person

  4. 180,000 military personnel in UK. 10,000 based in Scotland. Defence budget £50Billion. Scotland pays £5Billion. Trident, illegal wars and redundant weaponry. UK Gov fraud and mismanagement.

    Liked by 1 person

  5. I think it was on here that I mention a horticulture development programme I was involved with several years ago, island NW coast, and we were cautioned/advised not to use raw seaweed on the vegetables due to radioactive isotopes. Chernobyl? No Sellafield.

    It’s obscene, an outrage that this form of energy production is being supported or expanded.

    A link to the markers, the tracer isotopes of Sellafield, the British Library EThOS wouldn’t open. This is a summary of a PhD paper; https://theses.gla.ac.uk/77419/

    Here, an overview of global discharge policies. Sellafield is noted as being of interest due to the relaxation of discharge regulations in 1994; https://www.sciencedirect.com/topics/earth-and-planetary-sciences/nuclear-fuel-reprocessing

    Couldn’t find anything on the Isotope analysis, tracer isotopes for Hunterston. Did find this for Hunterston; the authorities found a complete spent fuel rod in March 2021, that should have gone to Sellafield. “Presents no hazard to public health.” and “No surprise, not unexpected” !!

    What happened to the proposal to turn the Hunterston site over to R&D with the Scottish Universities looking into the development of various energy production systems, fusion was mentioned and probably thorium.

    Liked by 1 person

Leave a comment

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.