‘Growing proportion of England’s flood defences in disrepair, analysis finds’

Flooding in Retford, Nottinghamshire, after Storm Babet battered the UK in October. Photograph: Joe Giddens/PA

From the Guardian today:

Ministers have been told they will be “punished” by voters after analysis revealed the decline of vital flood defences across England.

The proportion of critical assets in disrepair has almost trebled in the West Midlands and the east of England since 2018, leaving thousands of homes and businesses more vulnerable to storms.

Critical assets are defined as those where there is a high risk to life and property if they fail.

The east of England, which spans the Conservative heartlands from Suffolk to Bedfordshire and Essex, has one of the highest proportion of rundown flood defences in England, with nearly one in 11 – more than 850 assets – considered “poor” or “very poor” by Environment Agency inspectors.

https://www.theguardian.com/environment/2024/jan/01/growing-proportion-of-englands-flood-defences-in-disrepair-analysis-finds

There’s no mention of Scotland in the Guardian report, BBC England covers flooding but BBC Scotland has nothing to report. Three days ago, the Herald and the Sun (both tabloids) were frothing about delays in ‘SNP’ flood defences schemes but no evidence of places where these delays had mattered.

Last year, Reporting Scotland had been everywhere looking for flooded properties and perhaps lives endangered as the Met Office issued an Amber Alert.

Nothing beyond wet road surfaces and a few abandoned cars but they hadn’t given up.

in 2016, as major flooding of homes in England was desperately linked by ‘our’ media to a few cases in Scotland and supposed SNP failures.

Why are homes not flooding 40-50mm of rain in 24 hours?

As far back as 2006, researchers at the English College of Estates Management, whose patron was HRH Prince of Wales, made a number of highly encouraging comments about the achievements of the Labour-run Scottish Executive, SEPA and the Local Authorities:

As far as flood protection is concerned, unlike in England, the 1 in 200-year standard of protection is ‘universal’ for all new buildings, with a 1,000-year standard for such vulnerable uses as old people’s homes, schools, hospitals etc. In addition, construction in flood hazard areas has almost completely ended. Crichton (2003: 26) estimates that “the active flood management programme currently in progress will result in almost all high-risk properties being protected against the 200-year flood within the next three years, taking climate change into account.” It is also interesting to note that the Scottish Executive grants for flood defences have never been refused on the grounds of budget restraints and there is no rationing of flood defence spending.

It is clear, however, that the more stringent building standards which are applied in Scotland ensure that severe storms result in much less property damage than comparable events in England. Also, the level of flood protection and the commitment of funding to achieve flood protection are higher in Scotland than in England.’

College of Estates Management at: https://www.cem.ac.uk/media/28193/flooding.pdf

More recently, with SNP leadership, the favourable comparison still seems to hold. Published research from the esteemed Joseph Rowntree Foundation, in 2012, seems to support my first impressions quite strongly:

‘Where English planning regulations permit building in flood plains where there is no alternative, Scottish Planning Policy does not permit building in areas in which ‘the flood risk exceeds the 200-year return period’, i.e. where in any year there is a greater than 0.5 per cent probability of flooding. Scotland has stronger regulations governing the capacity of sewage and drainage systems for new building. It also has stronger minimum standards for flood defences. Building regulations ensuring flood resilience in the housing stock are more developed. Scottish planners, through Flood Liaison and Advice Groups, are engaged with local communities, the emergency services, insurers and other interested parties in drawing up flood plans. The differences in regulatory regimes between England and Scotland are reflected in the number of households that are at risk of flooding, and the resilience of communities in responding to those risks.’

The level of investment will be one factor in these differences. In recent years, spending in England and Wales has declined seriously after significant increases under Labour in 1997 to 2010, as revealed in a UK Parliament Briefing Paper from 2015:

‘Central Government spending on flood defence in 2010-11 was cut soon after the Coalition Government was formed. Spending was reduced in one year by £30 million or 5%. In the 2010 Comprehensive Spending Review (2011-12 to 2014-15), a total of £2.17 billion in central government funding was provided for flood and coastal defence. This represented “a six percent fall in central government funding”, The Committee on Climate Change calculated that this represented a real term cut of around 20% compared to the previous spending period.’

In sharp contrast, for Scotland, we see in a Scottish Parliament Committee Paper for 2014-2015, evidence of increasing investment:

‘With regard to flood protection and alleviation, the Committee welcomes the cash terms increases in the funding available to SEPA, and to the Natural Assets and Flooding  budget, both of which sit in the RAE portfolio. The Committee believes that, due to climate change, severe weather events will become increasingly likely in Scotland in years to come, and it is therefore essential that flood forecasting and warning systems be as accurate and robust as possible. The Committee welcomes the increased funding for flood forecasting and warning in the RAE portfolio and recommends that the Scottish Government continue to ensure sufficient funding is available to improve flood forecasting and warning systems, to ensure greater consistency across the whole of Scotland.’

As for more recent evidence of superiority in the Scottish system, see this at the Scottish government site and little (surprise, surprise) MSM coverage of it at the time:

‘£42 million a year plan over the next decade.

More than 10,000 families are to benefit from a ten year strategy to protect homes in many of Scotland’s most flood-prone communities. The plan is the result of grant funding totalling £420 million and follows an agreement reached between the Scottish Government and COSLA. The cash will be used to deliver 40 new flood protection projects and support local flood risk management plans. More than 130 flood protection studies will be carried out to help find potential solutions for another 26,000 residential properties currently at risk. The announcement came as the First Minister, Nicola Sturgeon, fulfilled her pledge to return to Newton Stewart following an earlier visit in the aftermath of flooding at Hogmanay.’

So, unlike the UK Government, the Scottish Government has maintained or bettered the investment and the sophistication in flood prevention here. Had I been writing in 2006, the Labour-controlled Scottish Executive would have rightly claimed any credit for performance north of the border. In 2016, the SNP-controlled Scottish Parliament can do the same. Will BBC Scotland allow them to do it? They clearly didn’t in the run-up to General Election in 2016 so I doubt it.

There you have it, my attempt to shore up our defence plans against a flood of BBC bias (See what I did there, again, again?) as we approach the UK Monsoon season.

Sources:

http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/science-environment-37306094

http://news.sky.com/story/16312m-flood-defence-plan-an-elastoplast-say-victims-10569571

http://www.gov.scot/Topics/Environment/Water/Flooding

College of Estates Management at:https://www.cem.ac.uk/media/28193/flooding.pdf

UK Parliament Briefing Paper at: http://webcache.googleusercontent.com/search?q=cache:tGK3kUO-iKEJ:www.parliament.uk/briefing-papers/sn05755.pdf+&cd=4&hl=en&ct=clnk&gl=uk

Scottish Parliament Paper at:http://www.scottish.parliament.uk/parliamentarybusiness/CurrentCommittees/70875.aspx

Scottish Act on Control of Flood water at:http://www.gov.scot/Resource/Doc/1057/0094052.pdf

WWF Report at: http://nationalfloodforum.org.uk/wp-content/uploads/floodplanner_web.pdf


Discover more from Talking-up Scotland

Subscribe to get the latest posts sent to your email.

5 thoughts on “‘Growing proportion of England’s flood defences in disrepair, analysis finds’

  1. In England, a number of bodies, mostly public ones, such as Councils and the Environment Agency, have joint responsibility to cooperate in ensuring protection against flooding. There is one group of private companies who are part of this joint responsibility – the privatised water companies who have a duty to ensure effective drainage systems.

    Being private companies their principal legal duty is to ‘maximise shareholder return’, i e make as big profits as they can to ensure big dividends. This means that other legal responsibilities such as the provision of clean water and ensuring effective and safe provision of drainage are subordinate to the profit requirement.

    Ofwat exists to monitor the water companies and can sanction them and Ofwat does, indeed, issue fines and orders. However, the companies have a history of building in expected fines into their business plans, so that profits are safeguarded and customers meet the cost with price increases.

    Isn’t privatisation wonderful?

    The UK media reports assume Scottish Water is a private company and that the same water, sewerage and flood duties apply in Scotland, too. Well, it is just a region or province, isn’t it?

    The Scottish media simply find shock stories about Scottish Water – e.g. fees for a course at Harvard – and focus on these.

    Liked by 2 people

  2. Interestng but at the tail end of 2023 Sky news in their supposedly annual review visited Cupar in Fife to chat to residents affected by the flooding there but no mention of the extensive flooding in England throughout the year. Just to reinforce Yes it’s worse in Scotland than in the South. To remain on topic the UK TV Weather men were predicting bad and wet weather for Hogmanay in Edinburgh just I suppose to discourage any visitors. They just cannot bear Scots having it better.

    Liked by 2 people

    1. To be fair, of the areas around Cupar likely affected, only one was granted planning permission on condition massive works were undertaken to minimise risk of flooding to the new properties, long before devolution in the days of RPBs….
      Cupar is in a depression on the R Eden, hence the scandal shits (did I spell that right ?) make a beeline for the Eden in heavy rains and make a song and dance about pollution in dry weather…
      Essentially it’s a slack point on the river but it’s way more complicated to explain to the muppets when Sky are only chasing negative headlines..
      If you hear mention of the Eden, 99.99% it’s propaganda….
      It’s 300 years since the Whitesands in Dumfries was first recorded as flooding, but the SNP are ever blamed for not solving the issue (tidal effects on the Nith believe it or not)….

      Like

  3. England suffers more than Scotland due to slack river gradients…
    However, it is true to say Scots planners didn’t cut greedy developers much slack unlike in England…

    Like

Leave a comment

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.