‘Bodies appeared to have been tipped into ground, all jumbled together and without signs of ceremony’

From BBC Tyne & Wear four days ago but nowhere on the BBC Scotland site:

Skeletons found near Durham Cathedral were those of 17th Century Scottish prisoners of war, tests have revealed.

Between 17 and 29 sets of remains were found in a mass grave in 2013 during work on a university library.

The bodies appeared to have been tipped into ground, all jumbled together and without signs of ceremony.

Following detailed study, experts from the university have dated them to 1650, and believe them to be soldiers captured during the Battle of Dunbar.

https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/uk-england-tyne-34116842

Reading this, I was reminded that events of this kind mark the beginning of an abusive relationship between the common folk of Scotland and the elites in both countries which had not disappeared even 300 years later in World War II.

In May 2020, after reading new research, I wrote:

Yet while the war dead of some countries were too numerous to count, we should be mindful that ‘Scotland is small enough to know all her sons by heart’

My headline comes from the conclusions to a thorough examination of the facts published in May 2019. I missed it at the time and, I suspect out media did too. Correct me if I’m wrong on that and anything else in this piece, of course.

With the UK media saturated with frankly disturbing jingoism based on myths about WWII, it seems like good moment to present this attempt to resolve the alleged myth that Scots had given more in blood on the WWI battlefields.

On 10th August 2014, with clear political intent, the Scotsman allowed Sir Hew Strachan to confirm it as a myth:

Great War worst for Scots troops ‘a myth’

https://www.scotsman.com/arts-and-culture/great-war-worst-scots-troops-myth-1529401

In Patrick Watt’s Manpower, Myth and Memory: Analysing Scotland’s Military Contribution to the Great War in the Journal of Scottish Historical Studies, on 24th May 2019 based on extensive research, a different fact emerges:

Overall, 91,800 out of the 702,410 fatalities sustained by the British Army were born in Scotland. This is a 13.07 per cent share of the British total, some 2.6 per cent higher than Scotland’s share of the British population. Even using the highest estimate of British army casualties supplied by the Commonwealth War Graves Commission (759,062 soldiers) gives a 12.09
per cent share of the British total, compared to 10.47 per cent of the British
population. The combined total of war dead for all three services – 102,500
soldiers, sailors and airmen – means that 13.78 per cent of the ‘official’ British total from 1921, or 12.32 per cent of the Commonwealth War Graves Commission total were born in Scotland. Therefore, it can be said with certainty that men born in Scotland did suffer disproportionately more deaths during the war than the other nations of the United Kingdom.

It’s a long hard read at:

http://repository.nms.ac.uk/2327

10 very interesting comments were made by readers then. You can see them at:

5 thoughts on “‘Bodies appeared to have been tipped into ground, all jumbled together and without signs of ceremony’

  1. Where’s Neil Oliver when you need him for comment?
    Oh…. the quasi archaeologist come history maker upper now political and social commentator…. ahh ..
    I wonder what he’d say….
    “Ach…its no a carpark Richard III”

    Liked by 2 people

    1. It is well recorded that England’s strongman Oliver Cromwell invaded Scotland and kead a Death March of defeated Scottish Army to Durham, where some survivors were sent as slaves ti English colonies. Sadly, Scots are often taught our history from English text books

      Liked by 2 people

  2. I read about the slaughter of the Scottish soldiers at Durham some time back they’d been marched there by the English army. They were murdered in their hundreds and dumped in mass graves.
    Obviously the Scots and English have been warring on each other for a very long time, but that episode seems particularly barbaric.

    Liked by 1 person

  3. It angers me when people say – it must be true, it’s history. History is recorded by people, usually people with their own agenda. It’s like saying ‘it’s in the bible so we mustn’t question it’ History is just an accumulation of stories which, in many cases, can neither be proven right or wrong.

    Like

Leave a reply to kelticgirl Cancel reply

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.