Today at 1:01pm, this popped up in my inbox squeezed between Matt Hancock (yeuch) alerts:
It said:
We’ve not been able to reply to your complaint within the time period we aim for. Although we manage this for most complaints, we regret it’s not been possible so far because we have been dealing with a higher than normal number of cases?
When did I first make the complaint about Reporting Scotland misrepresenting baby deaths figures fed to them by the creepy ACH? 5 January 2022 – almost exactly 10 months ago:
What’s their published target for a response – 2 weeks!
Talking-up Scotland 
Ah, but …. if the Scottish Government does not meet a target, they have to be pilloried mercilessly.
LikeLiked by 3 people
Targets to aim for
As far as ABC ( BBC) concerned, well if is not to trash Scotland
Then may i suggest tis a Barn Door they take aim at
For their miscued shots
Which in reality tends to backfire on them anyway
Many a sooty face within
Their sordid ranks
LikeLiked by 1 person
Targets to aim for
As far as ABC ( BBC) concerned, well if is not to trash Scotland
Then may i suggest tis a Barn Door they take aim at
For their miscued shots
Which in reality tends to backfire on them anyway
Many a sooty face within
Their sordid ranks
LikeLike
I would gladly assist you in any FOI enquiries to bbc scot
If it comes from private citizen they might reply in the legal timeframe
LikeLiked by 2 people
Thanks but they’re exempt from foi!
LikeLiked by 1 person
You need a pseudonym John, or that illegal?
BBC and their masters the Tories, are taking peoples’ money (by force) to lie and propagandise to the people, aye, a canny lot!
LikeLiked by 1 person
Dr John the Night Tripper? Prostatis.
LikeLiked by 2 people
What about ‘Effie Deans” – that appears to go down well with unionists .
LikeLiked by 2 people
Effing Dunce?
LikeLiked by 1 person
“we regret it’s not been possible so far because we have been dealing with a higher than normal number of cases?”
Considering the dross they serve up I am not surprised.
LikeLiked by 2 people
My last complaint?
They stated they would have looked at it–if it had been of interest to them. Their “interest” was not the point, I thought.
LikeLiked by 1 person
Reblogged this on Patzi Winter and commented:
False news from MisReporting Scotland
LikeLike