The embarrassing gap in intelligence, maturity and credibility between the writing of Daily Record reporters and that of AI

I was going to write this myself and I will add some evidence of NHS Ayrshire & Arran’s health below but, you know, we’re busy here and frankly, it’s not worth it, is it?

So Grok AI – ‘Is it accurate to refer to NHS Ayrshire Arran as ‘crippled?’

No, it is not accurate to describe NHS Ayrshire and Arran as “crippled” in any objective, factual sense, though the term has appeared in some sensational media headlines.The health board is undoubtedly facing very serious challenges, particularly financial ones, as highlighted by official audits and reports from late 2025:

  • Scotland’s Auditor General described the financial situation as “unprecedented” in severity.
  • The board required a £51.4 million loan (brokerage) in 2024/25 just to break even.
  • It faces a projected deficit of £33.1 million in 2025/26, with cumulative deficits projected over the medium term.
  • Auditors noted no clear plan yet for full financial sustainability, reliance on “overly optimistic” savings, and high levels of temporary staffing costs.
  • Outstanding loans total £129.9 million (the highest in NHS Scotland).
  • Operational pressures include mixed performance on waiting times (some areas below national targets, though with improvements in long waits), delayed discharges (contributing significant daily costs, with headlines citing over £75,000 per day in one report), and workforce shortages.

These issues place it among the most strained NHS boards in Scotland (alongside e.g. NHS Grampian), requiring urgent recovery planning with the Scottish Government.However, “crippled” implies near-total dysfunction, collapse, or inability to function — which does not align with reality:

  • Services continue to operate, including routine care, emergencies, maternity (e.g. births reported in early 2026), vaccinations, and other programmes.
  • The board’s own Delivery Plan for 2025/26 acknowledges the challenges but outlines actions for improvement, service reform, and collaboration.
  • Recent official news from the board focuses on ongoing service delivery, not crisis shutdowns.
  • While performance is below some targets (e.g. outpatient/inpatient waits), there are positive trends in reducing very long waits, and the board expresses confidence in further progress toward goals like no waits over 52 weeks by March 2026 in certain categories.

The word “crippled” has been used in tabloid-style Scottish media coverage (e.g. Daily Record headlines about delayed discharge costs “crippling” the service), but this is hyperbolic language rather than neutral description. Official sources (Audit Scotland, BBC reporting on audits, the board’s own documents) use measured terms like “unprecedented challenges,” “severe financial pressures,” or “significant risks” — not “crippled.” In summary, the board is under extreme pressure and not financially sustainable in its current form without major intervention and reform, but it remains operational and is actively addressing issues. Stronger, evidence-based terms would be “severely financially challenged,” “under significant strain,” or “facing unprecedented pressures” rather than “crippled.”

Grok AI does, sometimes find and refer to our work but clearly missed these:

6 thoughts on “The embarrassing gap in intelligence, maturity and credibility between the writing of Daily Record reporters and that of AI

    1. Currently, in the hack world of ‘journalism’, AI is a ‘bad thing’, because they read mainly the inane science fiction chuntering of other hacks who recall stories from Marvel comics and the less insightful science fiction which presented ‘aliens’ as always malign.

      AI has been part of our lives for several decades and, indeed, is involved as you read this posting. What AI can do is what computers and before them calculators and before them, slide rules and abacuses could do, is ‘crunch’ data very quickly according to algorithms created by real human intelligence. It organises the data so that humans can examine it and begin to make to formulate hypotheses.

      I have just read an article from the UK BIOBANK, for whom I have been a volunteer subject since its foundation, which reports on AI scanning of images of patients’ hearts, which can be undertaken in around one second to provide doctors with data that enables them to have more time to discuss the issues with patients and, together, decide what to do. It is this post AI scanning that real human intelligence deploys itself.

      As the article has shown, AI can search quickly, as Google and other search engines have been doing for three decades, through millions of documents, selecting relevant information and presenting it to us, to apply our human intelligence to. Many of us are aware of how our own inherent biases can affect the selections AI will make, and can phrase things in ways that minimise these biases. We can also apply our bias detection to the AI produced data and refine and clarify our hypotheses.

      What the hacks are doing is to ask AI, ‘this Scottish Government is pure bad so find things that demonstrate this and then give me some hyperboles that I can use to damn the SG.’

      Are hacks not taught that we have a range of words so that we can have a nuanced conversation?

      Like

  1. The British government is considering banning X because people create images such as Keir Starmer in a bikini. I suspect the subversive use of Grok to undermine the unionist “narrative” might be the real reason. After all, Steve Bell cartoons in the Guardian depicted the entire British cabinet in S&M gear for years.

    Liked by 1 person

Leave a comment

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.