
Professor John Robertson OBA
The Herald today above. Read it all before commenting? No need. No way.
Since a Mull councillor shouted that CalMac was the ‘worst ferry service in the world’, unchallenged on BBC Scotland, four years ago, I’ve been scouring for evidence.
I’ve done this because as a recovering sociologist, media feeding frenzies like the one we’ve seen on Scotland’s ferries make me twitch. I think, hang on, maybe there’s a yawning chasm emerging here, between the world of panic being constructed and the facts on the ground and that I should be looking into that chasm.
What do I mean by the facts on the ground?
Well, importantly compared with other comparable ferry services, how well does CalMac do on these key criteria:
- Passenger and staff safety
- Service in terms of number of vessels, ports and, of course, smaller vulnerable communities
- Cost in terms of affordability and generosity of government subsidy
- Reliability in terms of the percentage of sailings on time
- Investment in terms of age of vessels
CalMac’s performance on these criteria is fully transparent, like that of Scotland’s health, crime and education statistics. Regrettably, few other ferry services are under such scrutiny so the following comparisons will be at times difficult. Of course, a ferry service fully open to scrutiny is by definition better than one where facts are hidden.
Comparable?
CalMac operates 34 vessels to over 50 ports and harbours including 22 islands.
There are , just on that, comparable services in Indonesia, Bangladesh, New Zealand, Australia, Greece, Norway, Washington State and British Columbia. There may be others. If you can offer comparable evidence for these, please post that below.
I’m going to quickly take out Indonesia and Bangladesh on the first criterion, safety, as they regularly see the sinking of overcrowded vessels with multiple loss of life.
I’ll take Greece out too in the wake of the recent incident where a later-arriving passenger was pushed to his death by the crew. Regular reports of overcrowded and unsanitary vessels would also disqualify Greece.
I have to take Norway and New Zealand out as the unavailability of subsidy figures makes it impossible to compare cost in terms of affordability. That both are fully independent and Norway is massively rich would also make comparisons with Scotland problematic.
Australia can be quickly eliminated on cost as the government subsidy of only £3.86 per journey is dwarfed by that of Scotland at £29.80 per journey.
Washington State Ferries and British Columbia Ferries offer useful comparison with Scotland, WSF operates 21 vessels to 20 locations and BC ferries operates 41 vessels to 47 locations. Both services are managed by agencies responsible to and funded by devolved governments, as is the case in Scotland.
Bother, however, have the advantage of operating in the more affluent areas around Seattle and Vancouver and in warmer, less stormy seas on the Pacific west coast.
So, back to the criteria.
All three, WSF, BC Ferries and CalMac, are safe.
The Scottish Government subsidy to make prices affordable to all, at £29.80 per journey is nearly twice that of BC at £16,36.
For WSF, subsidy data per journey is not available but a 15 minute crossing from Vashon Island to Seattle costs $27 or £22 while a comparable crossing from Largs to Cumbrae is £13.90.
Reliability comparisons are difficult as only CalMac has to do daily figures. CalMac is currently averaging 95.4% on time.
WSF’s reliability is, according to reports, ‘the worst ever’ and BC Ferries is having an ‘unmitigated disaster.’
Washington State Ferries currently have 6 out of 21 ferries in docks and BC Ferries has 4 in dock. CalMac has, I think, only 2 in dock.
Finally on investment in new ferries, the average age of a CalMac ferry is 23, for BC Ferries it’s 36. For WSF, the average age is not published but 11 of the 21 are over 40 years old. Only 1 of CalMac’s 34 vessels is that age.
The governments of Washington State and British Columbia are never blamed in the media for anything to do with ferries.
Sources:
Ernst and Young https://www.transport.gov.scot/publication/strategic-framework-of-options-for-the-chfs-network-project-neptune/benchmarking/
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Washington_State_Ferries

Dead right they should. Will they get any credit from the usual suspects of the craven press? Maybe just a wee bit after May 8th next year. Maybe.
LikeLiked by 1 person
It is the “Scottish” media’s obsession with Cal Mac and its ferries fantasy that is most disturbing.
Do they really think this repetitive idiocy is doing harm to the SNP or do they realise how much the Scottish audience now detest them through their made up stories and manufactured “pop up” protest groups and are no longer subscribing to the Herald?
If only the Herald would go back a few years to the days when it used to produce two to three fluff pieces daily praising Michelle Moan and her rags to riches background and business acumen 🙂
LikeLiked by 1 person