UK ministers urged to consider lessons from Scotland, where laws state fostering agencies which are profit making cannot approve, review or terminate the approval of foster carers

By JB

Today in The Herald I see that they are blaming the Scottish Government, or more succinctly and inaccurately,  blaming the SNP for fostering agencies robbing millions of pounds of public money for their own profit, or as the headline states….” Call to end ‘backdoor profiteering’ in Scotland’s fostering system”.

The article opens with…….”Campaigners have called on the Scottish Government to take action against fostering agencies diverting millions of pounds of public money to their private equity-backed parent companies. Legally, foster care services for children and young people in Scotland must be provided on a not-for-profit basis”.

Call to end ‘backdoor profiteering’ in Scotland’s fostering system | The Herald

Damage done…shouts of SNP corruption, get Sarwar or Baillie or any British unionist party “spokesperson” or a “campaigner” working alongside those unionist parties, to deride and insult the Scottish Government who are, according to the report ‘Legally compliant, morally questionable’: Calls to end foster care profit ‘loophole’

No need to read any further as The Herald readers know all about that “nasty” SNP Government. No need to find out more information of the ‘real’ story as The Herald readers ‘know’ that their paper wouldn’t lie to them.

Or would they?

This from Community Care 2016 where the President of the Association of Directors of Children’s Services, Dave Hill, spoke out against Independent Fostering Agencies (IFAs) offering £3,000 “Golden Hellos” to foster carers to switch agencies.

“He urged ministers to consider lessons from Scotland, where laws state fostering agencies which are profit making cannot approve, review or terminate the approval of foster carers. Only a local authority, or voluntary agency acting on their behalf, can do this.

Hill said: “It just seems to us that this idea of a golden hello of £3,000 then charging higher rates back to us in a very short space of time is just immoral.”

In the article The Sunday Times reported last weekend how two of Britain’s biggest foster care companies, Acorn and the National Fostering Agency, were to merge in an ambitious £400m plan.  

Government wants to keep profit making out of child protection – why not from care?

So from what I can tell, this is a problem in England and not Scotland but because the problem is in England it is a problem in Scotland…..according to The Herald.

JB

4 thoughts on “UK ministers urged to consider lessons from Scotland, where laws state fostering agencies which are profit making cannot approve, review or terminate the approval of foster carers

  1. The Scottish Government has recently (October 2024 to February 2025) been consulting on the Future of Foster Care.

    ‘We are seeking views on our vision for the future of fostering in Scotland, all aspects of fostering and our future work in fostering.’ (my emphasis)

    The results will be published shortly I suspect.

    See: https://www.gov.scot/publications/future-foster-care-consultation/documents/

    So there have been opportunities for all interested parties to raise any fostering-related issue within this extended consultation period. So why the negative framing by The Herald now?

    Presumably – as with all public consultations – a range of contributors will have urged the ‘owner’ of the consultation, the Scottish Government, to do many and potentially different things. That’s kind of the point of seeking views before reaching a firm policy position.

    Liked by 1 person

  2. If I’m reading this correctly https://archive.ph/0unQI it’s more a case of the consultation looking to tighten up existing legislation to ensure it works as intended, and this article is Robin McAlpine publicising Common Weal’s own submission.

    If there were not a potential issue over care services, I doubt that SG would have consulted so widely.

    Like

  3. Scotland kinship payments mean more children can stay within their own families. Less children in care. Children can be fostered longer. They receive educational grants. Affordable accommodation. Do not pay council tax. Foster carers receive remuneration.

    Like

Leave a comment

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.