BBC hiding Kaye Adam’s loose standards on paying £124 000 tax put Matheson’s £11 000 roaming charges into perspective

Paying tax is for suckers!!!
Image Kaye Adams Instagram

From ITV, on 11 October 2023, but only spotted now after a month of careful concealment by the BBC:

Kaye Adams‘s dispute with HMRC over a potential £124k tax bill is being heard in court for the third time, four years after the legal battle first began. The Loose Women panellist, 60, won a previous court case in 2019, which was then reheard in 2021, with an upper tribunal also siding with the TV star.

However, following an appeal from HMRC a Court of Appeal judge ordered that the case be reheard once again, for the third time. HMRC claims that Kaye owes £81,150.60 in income tax and £43,290.98 in national insurance contributions from her time hosting The Kaye Adams Programme on BBC Radio Scotland from 2013 to 2017.

ITV Loose Women star taken to court over £124k tax dispute – OK! Magazine

If HMRC think she owes that much, how much were we paying her to run that appalling show?

Try searching for ‘BBC Kaye Adams tax’ and find not one BBC report.

Try STV and get the same – journos circle the wagons?

6 thoughts on “BBC hiding Kaye Adam’s loose standards on paying £124 000 tax put Matheson’s £11 000 roaming charges into perspective”

  1. If it’s not money fiddling it’s SEXUAL DEVIANT HIDING
    WHY IS BBC ALLOWED TO STAY IN BUSINESS AND TAKE MONEY FROM CITIZENS WHILST SIFTING MONEY
    FROM SCOTTISH ASSETS

    Liked by 1 person

    Reply

  3. Time for a BBC Disclosures investigation on the tax evasion /avoidance (?) schemes among the BeeB ”talent” !
    This is Public monies we are discussing – but not on the Kaye Adams prog.apparently .

    Liked by 4 people

    Reply

  4. We always knew that England were paying these traitors against Scotland in some underhand way it’s what they have always done and some people will do anything for money , including betrayal of your own country your own people.
    Remember the Rangers debacle that emerged as SEVCO , no harm done eh ? That’s what they tell us but we know the damage it does to the trust we have in people and organisations that are paid to help us , they’re not meant to backstab us but that’s exactly what they do because it’s all ran by England for England .

    Like

    Reply

  5. She’s had her day in court and won her case, obviously the court has ruled in her favour so what’s the big deal, why do you think people pay expensive accountants, to get the best tax deals within the framework of the law, nothing to see here, move along.

    Like

    Reply

Leave a comment

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.