The Herald, the EIS leader Larry Flanagan and his old Uni/union pal Richard Leonard have been running this scare for months now.
Call a vote on strike action then. Let’s see how strong support for this is.
With yet another of their useless self-selecting response surveys that, ironically, Flanagan would have been obliged to grade one of his own Modern Studies pupil’s projects at F, we hear:
Teachers are demanding the urgent introduction of blended learning as measures aimed at containing coronavirus in schools are routinely breached and not enough to keep teachers and pupils fully safe. A new survey by the Educational Institute of Scotland (EIS), the country’s largest teaching union, reveals that guidance stipulating a two-metre distance between themselves and students was impossible to follow consistently due to large class sizes and the demands of the job.
Scottish teachers are being used by this Scottish Labour cabal in a pathetic attempt to boost their vote s oblivion looms in 2021.
Then we hear that ‘survey respondents’ feel unsupported but only one is quoted and, at the end, of the need for more blended learning in Level 4 areas. Wait, there are no Level 4 areas.
What follows is a repeat but it seems the EIS leaders needs a revision session:
A summary of the latest evidence on coronavirus (COVID-19) in schools has been published. The paper, from the COVID-19 Advisory Sub-Group on Education and Children’s Issues, looks at the risks posed by the virus to pupils and staff, and the benefits to children and young people of schools remaining open.
- the rate of coronavirus-related sickness among pupils is low across the country – at 12 November, this represented about 0.1% of all pupils
- there is no direct evidence that transmission of the virus within schools plays a significant role in driving rates of infection among children
- data found there is no difference between COVID-19 positivity rates in teachers and school staff relative to other worker groups of the same age
- closing schools presents a serious risk of harm to the wellbeing of children and young people, particularly those who are vulnerable
- more than 75% of schools in Scotland did not have any pupils who tested positive for COVID-19 in the first term of the school year. Rises in positive cases in the last three weeks of term coincided with an increase in community prevalence across all adult age groups.
Professor Devi Sridhar, Chair of Global Public Health at the University of Edinburgh and a member of the COVID-19 Sub-Group, said:
The overwhelming evidence from across the world is that children are safest in school and that school closures increase educational inequalities and have long-term detrimental outcomes for young people. Scotland’s success in providing primary and secondary children full-time, in-person learning from mid-August should be an example for other countries in the world deciding their schools policy. The key factor in keeping schools open and safe is to reduce community prevalence by ensuring appropriate public health measures and restrictions are put in place to reduce community transmission.
Based on some ‘new figures’ where of course we don’t get to see the raw numbers, the Herald/EIS team is pushing hard on closing schools and closing down the SNP Government’s reputation for pandemic management while just ignoring yesterday’s report revealing that only 0.1% of pupils were infected, that 75% of schools had no infections and that teachers were no more at risk than any other workers.
After shocking us with the news that, as cases, were surging across the country, they were also up in Schools, they present their top piece of evidence:
The highest positive test rates are seen among S5/6 pupils where in October they reached 129 per 100 000.
Here’s some background.
There are less than 100 000, S5/6 pupils, spread across 357 schools in Scotland.
They’re often taught in much smaller classes than other levels so that spacing is feasible.
Senior pupils are expected to wear face masks in Leve 3 and 4 areas.
Finally, how does 129 per 100 000 compare with the rates faced by the communities outside of those classrooms?
So, infection levels in a typical S5/6 class with 10 or so pupils, spaced out, wearing face masks and not shouting, we hope, like those in the garage or warehouse nearby, are much lower than those outside?