Scotland Office and Scottish Tories say NOTHING about ‘ambitious new deal’

Credit AFP

By stewartb

The BBC News website (30 June) tells us this:

‘Boris Johnson has said now is the time to be “ambitious” about the UK’s future, as he set out a post-coronavirus recovery plan. The PM vowed to “use this moment” to fix longstanding economic problems and promised a £5bn “new deal” to build homes and infrastructure. Plans set out in the Tory election manifesto would be speeded up and “intensified,” he added.’

Source: https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/uk-politics-53234058

The same source also tells us: ‘Over the last few days, the comparisons the government has sought to draw have been with former American President Franklin Delano Roosevelt and his New Deal.’  So Johnson certainly ‘bigged-up’ this announcement!

There is also a reference here to a BBC Reality Check article which states: ‘Boris Johnson says: “It  (his announcement) sounds like a prodigious amount of government intervention. It sounds like a New Deal. All I can say is if that is so, then that is how it is meant to sound”.’

He is of course referring to Franklin D. Roosevelt’s New Deal programme which was designed to help the US recover from the Great Depression in the early 1930s. The BBC Reality Check article reminds us: “Remember that the New Deal ran over several years, with spending each year between about 5% and 7% of the total output of the economy (GDP) each year. Boris Johnson’s £5bn would be less than a quarter of one per cent of GDP.

However, I think there are easier and better comparisons to make in order to gauge the scale – the ‘ambition’ – of the Tory government’s £5bn ‘new deal’.

The National Audit Office (NAO) has recently (3 March, 2020) reported on what the Westminster government has spent on Brexit preparations. The report finds that the: Departments spent at least £4.4 billion on EU Exit preparations between June 2016 and 31 January 2020.”

Source: https://www.nao.org.uk/wp-content/uploads/2020/03/The-cost-of-EU-Exit-preparations.pdf

The NAO has also recently examined the price tag for the Palace of Westminster Restoration and Renewal Programme. It notes that in 2014 the various options for the conduct of the Programme ranged upwards from £3.5bn.

(The same NAO report tells us that: “Phase One of HS2 is now forecast to cost between 14% and 47% (£3.9 billion to £12.9 billion) more than its available funding.” i.e. the HS2 over-spend is of the same order of magnitude as Johnson’s ‘ambitious new deal’!)

Source: https://www.nao.org.uk/wp-content/uploads/2020/04/Palace-of-Westminster-Restoration-and-Renewal-Programme.pdf

So, in short, the ‘ambitious new deal’ is no such thing. And that’s before we take into account that little of this is new money but rather it’s about ‘accelerating’ what was proposed in prior spending announcements.

And this is telling!

As on 1930 hours on 30 June, the latest news on the Scotland Office website says NOTHING about the ‘ambitious new deal’. The latest news on the website of the Scottish Conservative and Unionist Party says NOTHING about the ‘ambitious new deal’.

4 thoughts on “Scotland Office and Scottish Tories say NOTHING about ‘ambitious new deal’”

  1. You make Johnson’s ambitious new deal sound bigger than it really is.
    The quote from the BBC Reality Check is “Boris Johnson’s £5bn would be less than a quarter of one percent of GDP if it were spent in a single year (which is unlikely).”

    Like

  2. https://www.theguardian.com/uk-news/2019/sep/25/hinkley-point-nuclear-plant-to-run-29m-over-budget

    “The cost of building the UK’s first new nuclear power plant in a generation has risen by up to £2.9bn and the total bill could be more than £22bn.

    EDF Energy said the construction cost for Hinkley Point C in Somerset had climbed by between £1.9bn to £2.9bn from the company’s last estimates and is running the risk of further delays.

    As a consequence, the total cost has risen from £19.5bn to between £21.5bn and £22.5bn.

    The nuclear developer blamed challenging ground conditions, which made earthworks at the site more expensive than it expected.

    The French company also misjudged the cost of adapting its new pressurised water reactor design to meet UK nuclear regulation standards. EDF is using the same reactor design at the Olkiluoto nuclear project in Finland and at Flamanville in France, where costs have also spiralled by billions of euros.

    EDF Energy’s strategy director, Paul Spence, told BBC Radio 4 that he “can’t be sure today” that there won’t be further cost increases at Hinkley Point, which is due to start supplying 7% of the UK’s electricity by 2025.”

    Like

  3. The Scots Tories will be keeping quiet about this, too.

    Click to access speech-barnier-eurofi-30062020_en.pdf

    From 1 January 2021, UK firms will lose the benefit of the financial services passports. In insurance, commercial bank lending or deposit-taking it will not be possible to award equivalences that would grant market access to third-country firms in the UK. In these areas, if British firms want to provide services in the EU, they must ask for an authorisation in the EU. Or comply with all the relevant national regimes of those EU Member States where they want to continue to be active.

    Like

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out /  Change )

Google photo

You are commenting using your Google account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.